Geetha.P.B vs Krishnasopanam Kuries (Pvt) Limited, Advocate - BABU K D — 285/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Status: Issue notice. Next hearing: 25th July 2026.
Crl.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: KLTR010107602025
Filing Number
3257/2025
Filing Date
24-Oct-2025
Registration No
285/2025
Registration Date
25-Oct-2025
Court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur
Judge
3-III Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Geetha.P.B
Adv. Saji Joseph
Respondent(s)
-
1.Krishnasopanam Kuries (Pvt) Limited, Advocate - BABU K D
-
2.State of Kerala, represented by Public Prosecutor, Thrissur.
Case History
-
25-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-May-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Crl.A.285/2025 The Principal Sessions Judge admitted Geetha P.B.'s appeal against her conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, finding an arguable case. The court suspended the impugned sentence and fine/compensation order on condition that the appellant execute a ₹50,000 bond with two sureties and deposit 20% of the fine amount within 60 days. Non-compliance will result in automatic vacation of the sentence suspension. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-May-2026
Issue notice
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur
-
19-May-2026
OrderView PDF
-
19-May-2026
Call on
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur
-
16-Mar-2026
No sitting notified
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur
-
22-Jan-2026
Adjourned
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur
-
10-Dec-2025
Issue notice
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur
-
28-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 285/2025
Case Summary: Crl.A.285/2025 The Principal Sessions Judge admitted Geetha P.B.'s appeal against her conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, finding an arguable case. The court suspended the impugned sentence and fine/compensation order on condition that the appellant execute a ₹50,000 bond with two sureties and deposit 20% of the fine amount within 60 days. Non-compliance will result in automatic vacation of the sentence suspension. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts