M/S Malayalam Benefit Fund Ltd vs JAYAN — 3/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section SECTION 37(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

CMA(Arb) - CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (ARBITRATION)

CNR: KLTR010099382026

Filing Number

3/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

3/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur

Judge

3-III Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section SECTION 37(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S Malayalam Benefit Fund Ltd

    Adv. Usha K D

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAYAN

  2. 2.BINDHU

  3. 3.SUBEESH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Additional District Judge-III, Thrissur dismissed the arbitration petition (CMA No. 3/2026) filed by M/S Malayalam Benefit Fund Ltd against respondents Jayan, Bindhu, and Subeesh on April 7, 2026. The court dismissed the case as "not pressed," indicating the petitioner did not actively pursue the matter during hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    III Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Call on

    III Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  5. 31-Mar-2026

    Call on

    III Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    Call on

    III Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Call on

    III Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District Judge-III, Thrissur dismissed the arbitration petition (CMA No. 3/2026) filed by M/S Malayalam Benefit Fund Ltd against respondents Jayan, Bindhu, and Subeesh on April 7, 2026. The court dismissed the case as "not pressed," indicating the petitioner did not actively pursue the matter during hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case