Give and take wrorld vs competent authority under BUDS — 5687/2025

Case under The Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019 Section 14. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 18th April 2026.

Crl.MP - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETN.

CNR: KLTR010098532025

Case disposed

Filing Number

5687/2025

Filing Date

23-09-2025

Registration No

5687/2025

Registration Date

24-09-2025

Court

District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur

Judge

3-III Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

Decision Date

18th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

The Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019 Section 14

Petitioner(s)

Give and take wrorld

Adv. EDISON THOMAS T

prasanth panachikkal

Adv. EDISON THOMAS T

Respondent(s)

competent authority under BUDS

Hearing History

Judge: 3-III Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

18-04-2026

Disposed

16-04-2026

Adjourned

13-04-2026

FOR HEARING

07-04-2026

FOR HEARING

04-04-2026

FOR HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

18-04-2026
Order

Case Summary: 5687/2025 The court dismissed the petition filed by GiveNtake World and Prasanth Panachikkal seeking release of attached vehicles and defrozen bank accounts. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused operated an illegal pyramid scheme disguised as a digital platform, fraudulently collecting over ₹15 crores from numerous victims by promising unrealistic returns (up to ₹82,95,500) contingent on recruiting new members—constituting violations of the BUDS Act, 2019 and Prize Chit and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978. Under Section 15(4)(b) of the BUDS Act, the court refused to release attached property unless sufficient assets remained for victim restitution; since no such alternative assets existed and irreparable harm to depositors would result, the petition was dismissed as devoid of merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 5687/2025 The court dismissed the petition filed by GiveNtake World and Prasanth Panachikkal seeking release of attached vehicles and defrozen bank accounts. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused operated an illegal pyramid scheme disguised as a digital platform, fraudulently collecting over ₹15 crores from numerous victims by promising unrealistic returns (up to ₹82,95,500) contingent on recruiting new members—constituting violations of the BUDS Act, 2019 and Prize Chit and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978. Under Section 15(4)(b) of the BUDS Act, the court refused to release attached property unless sufficient assets remained for victim restitution; since no such alternative assets existed and irreparable harm to depositors would result, the petition was dismissed as devoid of merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case