ICL Fincorp LTD vs Subramanian M K — 343/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 17(2). Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

MA (Arb) - MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION (ARBITRATION)

CNR: KLTR010097722026

Filing Number

342/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

343/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur

Judge

3-III Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CLOSED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 17(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ICL Fincorp LTD

    Adv. Biju A A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Subramanian M K

  2. 2.Ranjith PT

  3. 3.Sanjayan K S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: ICL Fincorp LTD v. Subramanian M K and Others (343/2026) The Additional District Judge-III, Thrissur heard the arbitration matter on 16 March 2026 and disposed of it by lifting the attachment and closing the proceedings. The court's order provides minimal reasoning, stating only "Heard. Attachment lifted. Communicate. M.A.(Arbitration) closed," indicating the arbitration matter was resolved by lifting any previously imposed attachment against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    III Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 343/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ICL Fincorp LTD v. Subramanian M K and Others (343/2026) The Additional District Judge-III, Thrissur heard the arbitration matter on 16 March 2026 and disposed of it by lifting the attachment and closing the proceedings. The court's order provides minimal reasoning, stating only "Heard. Attachment lifted. Communicate. M.A.(Arbitration) closed," indicating the arbitration matter was resolved by lifting any previously imposed attachment against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case