Poulose vs M/S Malayalam Benefit Fund Ltd. Advocate - SYAMA C — 1/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section Section 37(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 07th April 2026.

CMA(Arb) - CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL (ARBITRATION)

CNR: KLTR010095732026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

1/2026

Registration Date

03-03-2026

Court

District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur

Judge

3-III Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT Section Section 37(2)
IA/1/2026 Classification : Today Moving Petition Section PouloseM/S Malayalam Benefit Fund Ltd
IA/2/2026 Classification : Today Moving Petition Section PouloseM/S Malayalam Benefit Fund Ltd
IA/3/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section PouloseM/S Malayalam Benefit Fund Ltd

Petitioner(s)

Poulose

Adv. Usha K D

Sijo P.D

Adv. Usha K D

Baiju E.G

Adv. Usha K D

Respondent(s)

M/S Malayalam Benefit Fund Ltd. Advocate - SYAMA C

Hearing History

Judge: 3-III Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

07-04-2026

Disposed

04-04-2026

Call on

31-03-2026

Call on

26-03-2026

Call on

24-03-2026

Call on

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
Order

Case Summary: CMA(Arbitration) No.1/2026 The Additional District Judge-III, Thrissur dismissed the arbitration petition filed by Poulose, Sijo P.D., and Baiju E.G. against M/s Malayalam Benefit Fund Ltd. on April 7, 2026. The court dismissed the case as "not pressed," indicating the petitioners did not proceed with or pursue their claim during the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMA(Arbitration) No.1/2026 The Additional District Judge-III, Thrissur dismissed the arbitration petition filed by Poulose, Sijo P.D., and Baiju E.G. against M/s Malayalam Benefit Fund Ltd. on April 7, 2026. The court dismissed the case as "not pressed," indicating the petitioners did not proceed with or pursue their claim during the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case