Johnson vs Jacob Advocate - Prosecutor Sunil P(III ADC ) — 100143/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 96 O 41 R1. Status: Await LCR. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

AS - APPEAL SUIT

CNR: KLTR010072742024

Await LCR

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

e-Filing Number

05-12-2024

Filing Number

106175/2024

Filing Date

06-12-2024

Registration No

100143/2024

Registration Date

07-12-2024

Court

District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur

Judge

5-Additional District Court-II/Vigilance Judge,Thrissur

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 96 O 41 R1
IA/5/2025 Classification : Application For Stay During Pendency Of Appeal Section JohnsonJacob

Petitioner(s)

Johnson

Adv. arun Kaimal

Jincy johnson

Adv. arun Kaimal

Respondent(s)

Jacob Advocate - Prosecutor Sunil P(III ADC )

Hearing History

Judge: 5-Additional District Court-II/Vigilance Judge,Thrissur

11-03-2026

Await LCR

03-01-2026

Adjourned

13-10-2025

Appearance Of Parties

14-07-2025

FOR HEARING

12-06-2025

Call with IA

Interim Orders

25-02-2025
Order

Summary: The District Court of Thrissur granted a stay on the execution of the Munsiff Court judgment and decree dated 30.08.2024 in O.S.290/2018 for a period of 3 months. The Court found prima facie grounds in the appellants' memorandum of appeal and determined that executing the decree without a stay would cause harm to the petitioners and render the appeal infructuous. No additional security was ordered as the petitioners had already furnished sufficient security for the decree amount. The case is scheduled for next hearing on 22.05.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The District Court of Thrissur granted a stay on the execution of the Munsiff Court judgment and decree dated 30.08.2024 in O.S.290/2018 for a period of 3 months. The Court found prima facie grounds in the appellants' memorandum of appeal and determined that executing the decree without a stay would cause harm to the petitioners and render the appeal infructuous. No additional security was ordered as the petitioners had already furnished sufficient security for the decree amount. The case is scheduled for next hearing on 22.05.2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case