State of Kerala (Police) vs Anusal Advocate - DHIL K M, VIVEK VENUGOPAL — 101236/2024
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985\ Section 20(b)(ii)C. Status: FOR HEARING. Next hearing: 17th July 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLTR010059292024
Next Hearing
17th July 2026
Filing Number
112221/2024
Filing Date
14-10-2024
Registration No
101236/2024
Registration Date
18-10-2024
Court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur
Judge
5-Additional District Court-II/Vigilance Judge,Thrissur
FIR Details
FIR Number
411
Police Station
KODUNGALLUR
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Respondent(s)
Anusal Advocate - DHIL K M, VIVEK VENUGOPAL
Sarath
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Additional District Court-II/Vigilance Judge,Thrissur
FOR HEARING
Call for report.
Call for report.
Issue NBW
Adjourned
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 22-04-2026 | Call for report. |
| 16-03-2026 | Call for report. |
| 26-02-2026 | Issue NBW |
| 09-01-2026 | Adjourned |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 101236/2024 The II Additional Sessions Judge, Thrissur allowed the petition filed by accused Anusal (charged under NDPS Act sections 20(b) and 20(b)(ii)C) seeking release of his Samsung mobile phone seized during arrest on 19.03.2024. The court found the phone was private property unconnected to the alleged offence and retention served no purpose. The accused's mobile phone was ordered released upon executing a Rs.25,000 bond with two sureties, producing an attested photograph, and undertaking not to destroy, dismantle, sell or transfer it until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 101236/2024 The II Additional Sessions Judge, Thrissur allowed the petition filed by accused Anusal (charged under NDPS Act sections 20(b) and 20(b)(ii)C) seeking release of his Samsung mobile phone seized during arrest on 19.03.2024. The court found the phone was private property unconnected to the alleged offence and retention served no purpose. The accused's mobile phone was ordered released upon executing a Rs.25,000 bond with two sureties, producing an attested photograph, and undertaking not to destroy, dismantle, sell or transfer it until case disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur All courts →Explore other courts