Thankam vs Laila Advocate - Jayakumar P R — 100313/2013
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.41Rule1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th March 2026.
AS - APPEAL SUIT
CNR: KLTR010043332013
Filing Number
1003976/2013
Filing Date
15-11-2013
Registration No
100313/2013
Registration Date
15-11-2013
Court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur
Judge
4-IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Thankam
Adv. Sreekumar Puthezhath
Respondent(s)
Laila Advocate - Jayakumar P R
Hearing History
Judge: 4-IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
Order/Judgement
Order/ Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 13-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 28-02-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 05-02-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 100313/2013 The appellants (Thankam and family) appealed the trial court's dismissal of their suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement. The court upheld the dismissal, finding the sale agreements were executed to defeat respondents' family court maintenance claims against the original seller. The court determined the appellants failed to prove payment of advance amounts, lacked genuine readiness and willingness to perform, and the unregistered agreement could not support relief under Section 53A of the Transfer of Properties Act. Appeal dismissed with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 100313/2013 The appellants (Thankam and family) appealed the trial court's dismissal of their suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement. The court upheld the dismissal, finding the sale agreements were executed to defeat respondents' family court maintenance claims against the original seller. The court determined the appellants failed to prove payment of advance amounts, lacked genuine readiness and willingness to perform, and the unregistered agreement could not support relief under Section 53A of the Transfer of Properties Act. Appeal dismissed with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur All courts →Explore other courts