Althaf Noushad vs K P Abdulhameed And A K Usman Firm Anugraha — 100005/2024

Case under Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts (amendment) Act Section 13. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 12th March 2026.

C.A - Commercial Appeal

CNR: KLTR010042772024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

17-07-2024

Filing Number

105128/2024

Filing Date

18-07-2024

Registration No

100005/2024

Registration Date

18-07-2024

Court

District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts (Amendment) Act Section 13
IA/1/2026 Classification : Petition Section Althaf NoushadK P Abdulhameed And A K Usman Firm Anugraha

Petitioner(s)

Althaf Noushad

Adv. Saji Joseph

Respondent(s)

K P Abdulhameed And A K Usman Firm Anugraha

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

Adjourned

03-03-2026

No sitting notified

12-01-2026

Await report

06-01-2026

With connected case

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026

Order

Interim Orders

20-11-2024
Order

The District Court of Thrissur allowed the petitioner's application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 26-day delay, finding sufficient cause based on the affidavit and applying a liberal interpretation of the law. However, the petition was conditionally allowed requiring payment of Rs. 1,000 as cost to the respondent by December 4, 2024, failing which the petition would be dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The District Court of Thrissur allowed the petitioner's application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 26-day delay, finding sufficient cause based on the affidavit and applying a liberal interpretation of the law. However, the petition was conditionally allowed requiring payment of Rs. 1,000 as cost to the respondent by December 4, 2024, failing which the petition would be dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case