Sathyan vs Prakasan Advocate - SUJESH K, Praveena — 100104/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order41Rule1. Status: Await Lcr. Next hearing: 25th September 2026.
AS - APPEAL SUIT
CNR: KLTR010039362025
e-Filing Number
10-07-2025
Filing Number
101506/2025
Filing Date
11-Jul-2025
Registration No
100104/2025
Registration Date
14-Jul-2025
Court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur
Judge
4-IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur
Last updated 23-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sathyan
Adv. arun Kaimal
Respondent(s)
-
1.Prakasan Advocate - SUJESH K, Praveena
Case History
-
25-Sep-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Jun-2026
Await Lcr
IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur
-
18-May-2026
Await Records
IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur
-
30-Mar-2026
Issue notice
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur
-
23-Mar-2026
Order
Case Summary: 100104/2025 The Principal District Judge, Thrissur allowed Sathyan's petition to condone a 222-day delay in filing, finding no inordinate delay or gross negligence and that sufficient cause existed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The petition was allowed conditionally upon payment of Rs. 1,500 cost to respondent Prakasan on or before 30-03-2026, failing which the petition stands dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Call on
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur
-
21-Mar-2026
No sitting notified
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur
-
19-Mar-2026
Orders in IA
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur
-
14-Jan-2026
Adjourned
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur
-
26-Nov-2025
For Counter
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur
-
01-Nov-2025
Adjourned
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur
-
10-Sep-2025
For Counter
Principal District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur
-
14-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 100104/2025
Case Summary: 100104/2025 The Principal District Judge, Thrissur allowed Sathyan's petition to condone a 222-day delay in filing, finding no inordinate delay or gross negligence and that sufficient cause existed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The petition was allowed conditionally upon payment of Rs. 1,500 cost to respondent Prakasan on or before 30-03-2026, failing which the petition stands dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts