Sajeevan M A vs Shanthakumari — 100060/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 43(1). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 31st March 2026.
CMA - CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL
CNR: KLTR010036652025
e-Filing Number
01-07-2025
Filing Number
101384/2025
Filing Date
01-07-2025
Registration No
100060/2025
Registration Date
01-07-2025
Court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur
Judge
4-IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sajeevan M A
Adv. Jeno. N.A.
Shibu
Adv. Jeno. N.A.
Respondent(s)
Shanthakumari
Hearing History
Judge: 4-IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 24-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 23-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 17-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CMA 60/2025 — Sajeevan M A & Shibu v. Shanthakumari The appellants challenged a temporary injunction order granted by the trial court regarding disputed property in Thrissur. The court partly allowed the appeal, modifying the injunction: while it upheld the ban on rock blasting and altering the property's character, it removed the blanket trespass prohibition due to unclear property boundaries and insufficient documentary evidence establishing the appellants' claim to item No.2 property west of the private way. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CMA 60/2025 — Sajeevan M A & Shibu v. Shanthakumari The appellants challenged a temporary injunction order granted by the trial court regarding disputed property in Thrissur. The court partly allowed the appeal, modifying the injunction: while it upheld the ban on rock blasting and altering the property's character, it removed the blanket trespass prohibition due to unclear property boundaries and insufficient documentary evidence establishing the appellants' claim to item No.2 property west of the private way. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur All courts →Explore other courts