Sajeevan M A vs Shanthakumari — 100060/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 43(1). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

CMA - CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL

CNR: KLTR010036652025

e-Filing Number

01-07-2025

Filing Number

101384/2025

Filing Date

01-Jul-2025

Registration No

100060/2025

Registration Date

01-Jul-2025

Court

District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur

Judge

4-IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 43(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sajeevan M A

    Adv. Jeno. N.A.

  2. 2.Shibu

    Adv. Jeno. N.A.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shanthakumari

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: CMA 60/2025 — Sajeevan M A & Shibu v. Shanthakumari The appellants challenged a temporary injunction order granted by the trial court regarding disputed property in Thrissur. The court partly allowed the appeal, modifying the injunction: while it upheld the ban on rock blasting and altering the property's character, it removed the blanket trespass prohibition due to unclear property boundaries and insufficient documentary evidence establishing the appellants' claim to item No.2 property west of the private way. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  10. 09-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  11. 07-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  12. 06-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  13. 24-Feb-2026

    Order/Judgement

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  14. 23-Feb-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  15. 28-Jan-2026

    Order/Judgement

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  16. 07-Jan-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  17. 15-Dec-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  18. 10-Dec-2025

    Adjourned

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  19. 02-Dec-2025

    Order/ Judgement

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  20. 29-Nov-2025

    Call on

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  21. 12-Nov-2025

    Await Records

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  22. 04-Nov-2025

    Await Records

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  23. 20-Aug-2025

    For L C R

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  24. 19-Jul-2025

    Issue notice

    IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur

  25. 02-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 01-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 100060/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMA 60/2025 — Sajeevan M A & Shibu v. Shanthakumari The appellants challenged a temporary injunction order granted by the trial court regarding disputed property in Thrissur. The court partly allowed the appeal, modifying the injunction: while it upheld the ban on rock blasting and altering the property's character, it removed the blanket trespass prohibition due to unclear property boundaries and insufficient documentary evidence establishing the appellants' claim to item No.2 property west of the private way. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case