Jeema Shaji vs kenni pappu — 100164/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.41Rule1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED WITH COST on 06th April 2026.
AS - APPEAL SUIT
CNR: KLTR010031762014
Filing Number
1002802/2014
Filing Date
09-05-2014
Registration No
100164/2014
Registration Date
09-05-2014
Court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur
Judge
4-IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED WITH COST
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jeema Shaji
Adv. Sunil Konnanath
Paul
Adv. Sunil Konnanath
Xavior
Adv. Sunil Konnanath
Respondent(s)
kenni pappu
Jiby Peter
Shaji K.V
Hearing History
Judge: 4-IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/Judgement
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 23-02-2026 | Order/Judgement |
| 02-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 07-01-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
The IV Additional District Judge of Thrissur dismissed the appeal filed by Jeema Shaji, Paul, and Xavior against a lower court's decision in a boundary and construction dispute case. The plaintiffs sought injunctions to prevent defendants Kenni Pappu, Jiby Peter, and Shaji K.V. from constructing a waste treatment plant on adjacent property, but the court found no credible evidence that a waste treatment plant was being constructed—only a rain water harvesting facility built with Panchayath permission. The court upheld the dismissal, finding the plaintiffs failed to prove their allegations, abandoned their trespass claim through amended pleadings, and approached the court with unclean hands. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The IV Additional District Judge of Thrissur dismissed the appeal filed by Jeema Shaji, Paul, and Xavior against a lower court's decision in a boundary and construction dispute case. The plaintiffs sought injunctions to prevent defendants Kenni Pappu, Jiby Peter, and Shaji K.V. from constructing a waste treatment plant on adjacent property, but the court found no credible evidence that a waste treatment plant was being constructed—only a rain water harvesting facility built with Panchayath permission. The court upheld the dismissal, finding the plaintiffs failed to prove their allegations, abandoned their trespass claim through amended pleadings, and approached the court with unclean hands. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur All courts →Explore other courts