State of kerala(Excise) vs Shafi Advocate - MOHAMED SABAH P — 100395/2025
Case under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985\ Section 20(b)ii(B),20(b)ii(c)29and60(3). Status: Hearing on Charge. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLTR010025872025
Next Hearing
16th July 2026
Filing Number
101923/2025
Filing Date
09-05-2025
Registration No
100395/2025
Registration Date
09-05-2025
Court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur
Judge
5-Additional District Court-II/Vigilance Judge,Thrissur
FIR Details
FIR Number
49
Police Station
Excise Circle Office, Chavakkad
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of kerala(Excise)
Respondent(s)
Shafi Advocate - MOHAMED SABAH P
Akbar
Adv. MOHAMED SABAH P
Niyas
Adv. DHIL K M,VIVEK VENUGOPAL
Abdul Rahman
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Additional District Court-II/Vigilance Judge,Thrissur
Hearing on Charge
Call on
For production of documents/Affidavit
Call on
Oders in CMP
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Hearing on Charge |
| 05-05-2026 | Call on |
| 04-05-2026 | For production of documents/Affidavit |
| 30-04-2026 | Call on |
| 29-04-2026 | Oders in CMP |
Interim Orders
Case 100395/2025 Summary: Bail petitions filed by Akbar and Shafi, accused in a narcotic drugs case involving possession of 18.725 kg ganja and 1.994 kg hashish oil, were granted on April 30, 2026. The court found the arrest vitiated due to failure to communicate grounds of arrest to relatives as required by law. Though the prosecution opposed bail citing serious offences and criminal antecedents, the court granted release on Rs. 50,000 bond each with two sureties, passport surrender, and conditions prohibiting witness tampering and similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 100395/2025 Summary: Bail petitions filed by Akbar and Shafi, accused in a narcotic drugs case involving possession of 18.725 kg ganja and 1.994 kg hashish oil, were granted on April 30, 2026. The court found the arrest vitiated due to failure to communicate grounds of arrest to relatives as required by law. Though the prosecution opposed bail citing serious offences and criminal antecedents, the court granted release on Rs. 50,000 bond each with two sureties, passport surrender, and conditions prohibiting witness tampering and similar offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur All courts →Explore other courts