BRD Finance Limited vs Rema — 100148/2025
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 9. Status: Declared Holidays. Next hearing: 24th July 2026.
MA (Arb) - MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION (ARBITRATION)
CNR: KLTR010019562025
Next Hearing
24th July 2026
e-Filing Number
08-04-2025
Filing Number
100548/2025
Filing Date
11-04-2025
Registration No
100148/2025
Registration Date
11-04-2025
Court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur
Judge
4-IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BRD Finance Limited
Adv. AJAYAKUMAR M.B
Respondent(s)
Rema
Hearing History
Judge: 4-IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Thrissur
Declared Holidays
Call on
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
Order/Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-05-2026 | Declared Holidays |
| 08-04-2026 | Call on |
| 16-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 16-02-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 20-01-2026 | Order/Judgement |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: BRD Finance Limited v. Rema (M.A. 148/2025) The IV Additional District Judge of Thrissur granted a conditional attachment order under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. BRD Finance Limited, a non-banking financial company, sought to attach respondents' property (2.02 acres) to secure a loan default of Rs. 52,660/- due as of January 17, 2025, fearing the respondents would alienate the property to defeat arbitration proceedings. The court found a prima facie case and issued notice to respondents to show cause why they should not furnish security of Rs. 55,000/-, with conditional attachment of the scheduled property in the meantime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: BRD Finance Limited v. Rema (M.A. 148/2025) The IV Additional District Judge of Thrissur granted a conditional attachment order under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. BRD Finance Limited, a non-banking financial company, sought to attach respondents' property (2.02 acres) to secure a loan default of Rs. 52,660/- due as of January 17, 2025, fearing the respondents would alienate the property to defeat arbitration proceedings. The court found a prima facie case and issued notice to respondents to show cause why they should not furnish security of Rs. 55,000/-, with conditional attachment of the scheduled property in the meantime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur All courts →Explore other courts