Silabu M K vs Vadanappilly Chitties Pvt Ltd Advocate - SAJI FRANCIS — 100084/2023
Case under Cr. P.c. \ Section 374. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.
Crl.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: KLTR010015902023
e-Filing Number
24-03-2023
Filing Number
101159/2023
Filing Date
24-03-2023
Registration No
100084/2023
Registration Date
25-03-2023
Court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur
Judge
5-Additional District Court-II/Vigilance Judge,Thrissur
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Silabu M K
Adv. SHINE P V
Respondent(s)
Vadanappilly Chitties Pvt Ltd Advocate - SAJI FRANCIS
State of Kerala(PP)
Adv. Public Prosecutor SUNILKUMAR K.B(PDC)
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Additional District Court-II/Vigilance Judge,Thrissur
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 22-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 18-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 30-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 100084/2023 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed Silabu M K's appeal and upheld the trial court's conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found sufficient evidence that the accused issued a dishonored cheque for Rs. 14,742 to discharge a legally enforceable debt from a chitty (group savings scheme) transaction, and rejected the accused's unsubstantiated claim of prior repayment. Key Reasoning: The court applied statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the NI Act, placing the burden on the accused to rebut these presumptions after the cheque's execution was established. The complainant's witness testimony, coupled with chitty transaction documents, proved the debt existed. The accused failed to provide documentary evidence supporting his repayment defense and did not respond to the statutory notice, undermining his credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 100084/2023 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed Silabu M K's appeal and upheld the trial court's conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found sufficient evidence that the accused issued a dishonored cheque for Rs. 14,742 to discharge a legally enforceable debt from a chitty (group savings scheme) transaction, and rejected the accused's unsubstantiated claim of prior repayment. Key Reasoning: The court applied statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the NI Act, placing the burden on the accused to rebut these presumptions after the cheque's execution was established. The complainant's witness testimony, coupled with chitty transaction documents, proved the debt existed. The accused failed to provide documentary evidence supporting his repayment defense and did not respond to the statutory notice, undermining his credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur All courts →Explore other courts