state of Kerala Police vs HAREESH KUMAR — 100198/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),238. Status: Remand Extended. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLTR010015362025
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
e-Filing Number
21-03-2025
Filing Number
101194/2025
Filing Date
21-03-2025
Registration No
100198/2025
Registration Date
21-03-2025
Court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur
Judge
5-Additional District Court-II/Vigilance Judge,Thrissur
FIR Details
FIR Number
1195
Police Station
TOWN WEST THRISSUR
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
state of Kerala Police
Respondent(s)
HAREESH KUMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Additional District Court-II/Vigilance Judge,Thrissur
Remand Extended
Remand Extended
Remand Extended
Remand Extended
Remand Extended
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-06-2026 | Remand Extended |
| 21-05-2026 | Remand Extended |
| 07-05-2026 | Remand Extended |
| 24-04-2026 | Remand Extended |
| 10-04-2026 | Remand Extended |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Kerala Police v. Hareesh Kumar (Crl.M.P. 5311/2025) Outcome: Bail application DISMISSED. Hareesh Kumar, accused of murdering Shamjad on 19.09.2024 and destroying evidence, sought bail after being in judicial custody since 01.10.2024. The court found a strong prima facie case against him based on CCTV footage showing him last seen with the deceased, his sole exit from the crime scene, a plastic cover linking him to the body, and his refusal to explain events during interrogation. Given his nine prior criminal cases, risk of fleeing justice, and gravity of offences under BNS sections 103(1) and 238, the court dismissed the application, holding bail would cause miscarriage of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Kerala Police v. Hareesh Kumar (Crl.M.P. 5311/2025) Outcome: Bail application DISMISSED. Hareesh Kumar, accused of murdering Shamjad on 19.09.2024 and destroying evidence, sought bail after being in judicial custody since 01.10.2024. The court found a strong prima facie case against him based on CCTV footage showing him last seen with the deceased, his sole exit from the crime scene, a plastic cover linking him to the body, and his refusal to explain events during interrogation. Given his nine prior criminal cases, risk of fleeing justice, and gravity of offences under BNS sections 103(1) and 238, the court dismissed the application, holding bail would cause miscarriage of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur All courts →Explore other courts