Esaf Small Finance Bank Ltd vs Saaf Capit Federation — 100001/2023
Case under Trade Marks Act Section 134. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 27th June 2026.
OS Trd.Mrk - TRADE MARKS
CNR: KLTR010015232023
Next Hearing
27th June 2026
e-Filing Number
21-03-2023
Filing Number
100458/2023
Filing Date
23-03-2023
Registration No
100001/2023
Registration Date
24-03-2023
Court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur
Judge
5-Additional District Court-II/Vigilance Judge,Thrissur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Esaf Small Finance Bank Ltd
Adv. GEOFY GEORGE P
Respondent(s)
Saaf Capit Federation
Esaf Foundation
Adv. Jijo Anto
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Additional District Court-II/Vigilance Judge,Thrissur
Issues
Issues
Issues
No sitting notified
Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | Issues |
| 16-03-2026 | Issues |
| 16-02-2026 | Issues |
| 16-12-2025 | No sitting notified |
| 05-11-2025 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 100001/2023 Outcome: Petition dismissed (temporary injunction denied). ESAF Small Finance Bank sought a temporary injunction against SAAF Capit Federation for alleged trademark infringement and passing off. The District Court of Thrissur found no prima facie case for infringement. The court determined that despite minimal overlap in the letters "SAF/SAAF," the trademarks were distinctly different in visual presentation, color, emblems, and phonetic pronunciation, falling short of "deceptive similarity" under trademark law. Additionally, the parties' financial services activities were sufficiently different to avoid customer confusion. The petition was dismissed on July 6, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 100001/2023 Outcome: Petition dismissed (temporary injunction denied). ESAF Small Finance Bank sought a temporary injunction against SAAF Capit Federation for alleged trademark infringement and passing off. The District Court of Thrissur found no prima facie case for infringement. The court determined that despite minimal overlap in the letters "SAF/SAAF," the trademarks were distinctly different in visual presentation, color, emblems, and phonetic pronunciation, falling short of "deceptive similarity" under trademark law. Additionally, the parties' financial services activities were sufficiently different to avoid customer confusion. The petition was dismissed on July 6, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur All courts →Explore other courts