Prahladan C K vs State of Kerala (Collector) — 100092/2018
Case under Electricity Act \ Section 51. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 19th March 2026.
OP Elcty - OP(ELECTRICITY)
CNR: KLTR010010812018
Filing Number
102871/2018
Filing Date
12-03-2018
Registration No
100092/2018
Registration Date
14-03-2018
Court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur
Judge
5-Additional District Court-II/Vigilance Judge,Thrissur
Decision Date
19th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prahladan C K
Adv. Jomy John
Respondent(s)
State of Kerala (Collector)
Power Grid Cooperation of India
Adv. GIRISH MOHAN
Power Grid Cooperation of India
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Additional District Court-II/Vigilance Judge,Thrissur
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
For further hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 09-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 23-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 04-02-2026 | For further hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: EOP 92/2018 - Prahladhan C.K v. State of Kerala Court Decision: The Additional District Judge partially allowed the petition, awarding the petitioner Rs. 30,99,592 with 9% interest from November 25, 2011, for enhanced compensation related to tree cutting and land value diminution caused by a 400KV power transmission line through his property. Key Findings: The court rejected the limitation defense, determined initial compensation was insufficient, and calculated enhanced amounts based on actual yields and market values of the various trees cut (coconut, arecanut, nutmeg, pepper vines, etc.), while also granting 50% diminution compensation for affected land area. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: EOP 92/2018 - Prahladhan C.K v. State of Kerala Court Decision: The Additional District Judge partially allowed the petition, awarding the petitioner Rs. 30,99,592 with 9% interest from November 25, 2011, for enhanced compensation related to tree cutting and land value diminution caused by a 400KV power transmission line through his property. Key Findings: The court rejected the limitation defense, determined initial compensation was insufficient, and calculated enhanced amounts based on actual yields and market values of the various trees cut (coconut, arecanut, nutmeg, pepper vines, etc.), while also granting 50% diminution compensation for affected land area. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
More from this court
District And Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur All courts →Explore other courts