State of Kerala (Police) vs REGHU Advocate - Vinu M Thomas — 402516/2016
Case under Ipc \ Section 294(b), 323, 506(i). Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED on 19th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLPT140081042016
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
402516/2016
Filing Date
17-10-2016
Registration No
402516/2016
Registration Date
17-10-2016
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Thiruvalla
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
19th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
1979
Police Station
Keezhvaipur Police Station
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Respondent(s)
REGHU Advocate - Vinu M Thomas
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
No sitting notified
FOR HEARING
NBW to cws
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement | |
| 11-03-2026 | No sitting notified | |
| 05-03-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 10-02-2026 | NBW to cws |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Thiruvalla Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Reghu of charges under IPC sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 506(i) (criminal intimidation). The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case because all material witnesses turned hostile—the primary witness settled the dispute with the accused and stated he did not wish to proceed. With no credible evidence against the accused, the guilt remained unproven, resulting in acquittal under CrPC section 255(1), and the accused was set at liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Thiruvalla Judicial Magistrate acquitted accused Reghu of charges under IPC sections 323 (voluntarily causing hurt) and 506(i) (criminal intimidation). The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case because all material witnesses turned hostile—the primary witness settled the dispute with the accused and stated he did not wish to proceed. With no credible evidence against the accused, the guilt remained unproven, resulting in acquittal under CrPC section 255(1), and the accused was set at liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts