State of Kerala (Police) vs Mithun Mathew Advocate - ABHILASH GOPAN — 401771/2017
Case under Ipc \ Section 279, 304 (A). Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED on 26th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLPT140079602017
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
401771/2017
Filing Date
12-10-2017
Registration No
401771/2017
Registration Date
12-10-2017
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Thiruvalla
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
26th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--AQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
762
Police Station
Keezhvaipur Police Station
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Adv. Asst. Public Prosecutor (JFMC Tvla)
Respondent(s)
Mithun Mathew Advocate - ABHILASH GOPAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
No sitting notified
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-03-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 19-03-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 13-03-2026 | FOR HEARING | |
| 11-03-2026 | No sitting notified |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Thiruvalla acquitted Midhun Mathew of all charges under sections 279 and 304A IPC and sections 184, 134(a)(b) of the MV Act in a fatal car accident case. The court found that key prosecution witnesses turned hostile, the only eyewitness had hearsay knowledge, and there was no ocular evidence to prove the accused was driving negligently or rashly, nor that any rash/negligent act directly caused the victim's death. The prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Thiruvalla acquitted Midhun Mathew of all charges under sections 279 and 304A IPC and sections 184, 134(a)(b) of the MV Act in a fatal car accident case. The court found that key prosecution witnesses turned hostile, the only eyewitness had hearsay knowledge, and there was no ocular evidence to prove the accused was driving negligently or rashly, nor that any rash/negligent act directly caused the victim's death. The prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts