State of Kerala (Police) vs Geetha Advocate - Reshma. R — 400058/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,148,149,447,427,188. Disposed: Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLPT140004682017
Filing Number
400436/2017
Filing Date
07-01-2017
Registration No
400058/2017
Registration Date
08-02-2017
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Thiruvalla
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--AQUITTED U/S 248(1) CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
464
Police Station
Pulikeezhu Police Station
Year
2011
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Respondent(s)
Geetha Advocate - Reshma. R
SUja
Adv. Reshma. R
Sarojini
Adv. Reshma. R
Reji
Suma Reji
Manikuttan
Sasi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Disposed
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
To summon witness
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 26-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 19-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 05-02-2026 | To summon witness |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Geetha & Others (CC 58/2017) The Judicial Magistrate acquitted all eight accused of charges under IPC sections 143, 147, 148, 447, 427, and 188 r/w 149, relating to alleged unlawful assembly, rioting with weapons, criminal trespass, and property damage on 14/09/2011. The prosecution's case collapsed when both key witnesses turned hostile—the complainant (PW1) testified he didn't know who trespassed and had settled the dispute, while PW2 denied witnessing the incident. Unable to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, the court found the charges unproven and discharged all accused under section 248(1) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Geetha & Others (CC 58/2017) The Judicial Magistrate acquitted all eight accused of charges under IPC sections 143, 147, 148, 447, 427, and 188 r/w 149, relating to alleged unlawful assembly, rioting with weapons, criminal trespass, and property damage on 14/09/2011. The prosecution's case collapsed when both key witnesses turned hostile—the complainant (PW1) testified he didn't know who trespassed and had settled the dispute, while PW2 denied witnessing the incident. Unable to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, the court found the charges unproven and discharged all accused under section 248(1) CrPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts