Suma V T vs Cicily Advocate - RAJESH KUMAR C — 300528/2013
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Section26,order7,Rule1. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd May 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLPT130005312013
Next Hearing
22nd May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
300528/2013
Filing Date
28-10-2013
Registration No
300528/2013
Registration Date
28-10-2013
Court
Munsiff Court, Thiruvalla
Judge
1-Munsiff
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suma V T
Adv. C Rajesh kumar
Thankamma P T
Adv. JINACHANDRAN. V
Respondent(s)
Cicily Advocate - RAJESH KUMAR C
Shino Mon
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
For Defendent Evidence
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 23-03-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 11-03-2026 | For Defendent Evidence | |
| 05-03-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 24-02-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The suit for declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction was allowed and decreed by the Munsiff Court, Thiruvalla on 27 November 2019. The court declared that the disputed pathway (thodu/nadavazhi) constitutes the legitimate right of way to the plaintiffs' property and restrained the defendants from obstructing, altering, or encroaching upon it. The court found the plaintiffs' claims substantiated by affidavits and documentary evidence, dismissing the defendants' contentions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The suit for declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction was allowed and decreed by the Munsiff Court, Thiruvalla on 27 November 2019. The court declared that the disputed pathway (thodu/nadavazhi) constitutes the legitimate right of way to the plaintiffs' property and restrained the defendants from obstructing, altering, or encroaching upon it. The court found the plaintiffs' claims substantiated by affidavits and documentary evidence, dismissing the defendants' contentions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts