P GIRISH vs Thiru Erankavu Bhagavatti Devaswom Temple, Kavumbhagom PO, Thiruvalla Taluk represented by its secretary. Advocate - P.K.REVI — 305/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SECTION 26 ORDER 7 RULE 1 OF C.P.C. Status: For Written Statement on Counter Claim. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.

For Written Statement on Counter Claim Next hearing 14-Jul-2026 this date has passed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLPT130004722025

Filing Number

455/2025

Filing Date

23-Sep-2025

Registration No

305/2025

Registration Date

24-Sep-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Thiruvalla

Judge

1-Munsiff

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section SECTION 26 ORDER 7 RULE 1 OF C.P.C

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P GIRISH

    Adv. Jacob Thomas Vanchipalam

  2. 2.V.K Muraleedharan Nair

    Adv. Jacob Thomas Vanchipalam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Thiru Erankavu Bhagavatti Devaswom Temple, Kavumbhagom PO, Thiruvalla Taluk represented by its secretary. Advocate - P.K.REVI

  2. 2.Santhosh Kumar

    Adv. P.K.REVI

  3. 3.Ajith K N Raj

    Adv. P.K.REVI

Case History

  1. 14-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-May-2026

    For Written Statement on Counter Claim

    Munsiff

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  4. 16-Jan-2026

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  5. 24-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  6. 18-Nov-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff

  7. 21-Oct-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: OS 305/2025 Outcome: Petition dismissed with no order as to costs. Key Facts: P. Girish and V.K. Muraleedharan Nair (temple general body members) sought an injunction to prevent elections at Thiru Erankavu Bhagavatti Devaswom Temple scheduled for 26-10-2025. They contended the governing body's three-year term expired 17-07-2025 without obtaining required general body approval to continue as caretaker committee under Rule 27(1) of temple bylaws. The respondent temple management argued that permission was granted on 20-07-2025 for a six-month interim period. The court found the minutes book supported the respondents' claim, determined no prima facie case existed, and held that the statutory deadline for obtaining retrospective approval had already passed, making further delay imprudent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 24-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 23-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 305/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS 305/2025 Outcome: Petition dismissed with no order as to costs. Key Facts: P. Girish and V.K. Muraleedharan Nair (temple general body members) sought an injunction to prevent elections at Thiru Erankavu Bhagavatti Devaswom Temple scheduled for 26-10-2025. They contended the governing body's three-year term expired 17-07-2025 without obtaining required general body approval to continue as caretaker committee under Rule 27(1) of temple bylaws. The respondent temple management argued that permission was granted on 20-07-2025 for a six-month interim period. The court found the minutes book supported the respondents' claim, determined no prima facie case existed, and held that the statutory deadline for obtaining retrospective approval had already passed, making further delay imprudent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case