Susan Thomas vs State Of Kerala rep by District Collector, Pathanamthitta — 300156/2018
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26,Order7,Rule1. Disposed: Contested--DECREED WITH COST on 31st March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLPT130002242018
Filing Number
300156/2018
Filing Date
07-04-2018
Registration No
300156/2018
Registration Date
07-04-2018
Court
Munsiff Court, Thiruvalla
Judge
1-Munsiff
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED WITH COST
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Susan Thomas
Adv. V.A.JOSEPH, V.A.JOSEPH
Respondent(s)
State Of Kerala rep by District Collector, Pathanamthitta
Tahsildar, Thiruvalla D2
Village Officer, Thiruvalla D3
Muncipality, Thiruvalla rep by Secretary D4
Adv. G. Santhosh
bejoy Kurian Alexander D5
Adv. D. Sreekumar
Mohanan D6
Shylaja
Mahes
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff
Disposed
No sitting notified
Order/ Judgement
For further hearing
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | No sitting notified |
| 23-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 18-03-2026 | For further hearing |
| 12-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Susan Thomas v. State of Kerala (OS 300156/2018) The Munsiff Court decreed Susan Thomas's suit against Thiruvalla Municipality and contractor Bijoy Kurian Alexander, holding that Thomas owns a 7.65-acre triangular property with well-defined boundaries and granting mandatory injunction to reinstate a demolished 3-meter compound wall, plus perpetual prohibitory injunction restraining defendants from trespassing, damaging structures, or annexing any portion of the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Susan Thomas v. State of Kerala (OS 300156/2018) The Munsiff Court decreed Susan Thomas's suit against Thiruvalla Municipality and contractor Bijoy Kurian Alexander, holding that Thomas owns a 7.65-acre triangular property with well-defined boundaries and granting mandatory injunction to reinstate a demolished 3-meter compound wall, plus perpetual prohibitory injunction restraining defendants from trespassing, damaging structures, or annexing any portion of the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts