Seeja Reghunath vs Amal Sasidharan Advocate - JACOB PHILIP — 300002/2023
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Order20Rule18. Disposed: Uncontested--FINAL DECREE PASSED. on 08th April 2026.
FDA - FINAL DECREE APPLICATION
CNR: KLPT130000312023
Filing Number
42/2023
Filing Date
20-Jan-2023
Registration No
300002/2023
Registration Date
20-Jan-2023
Court
Munsiff Court, Thiruvalla
Judge
1-Munsiff
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--FINAL DECREE PASSED.
Last updated 30-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Seeja Reghunath
Adv. Shisha K.M.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Amal Sasidharan Advocate - JACOB PHILIP
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The Munsiff Court of Thiruvalla passed a final decree in a partition suit, allocating 2.12 ares (plot "GHEDCBAG") to petitioner Seeja Reghunath and 2.02 ares (plot "EFGHE") to respondent Amal Sasidharan, based on a preliminary decree finding both were equal co-owners. The court declined to partition the existing residential building (in the respondent's portion) to avoid affecting its utility, instead equalizing shares through land area and ensuring the petitioner received road frontage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Disposed
Munsiff
-
07-Apr-2026
For Orders in Ea
Munsiff
-
25-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
Munsiff
-
21-Mar-2026
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
19-Mar-2026
Order/Judgement
Munsiff
-
18-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
12-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
03-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
Munsiff
-
25-Feb-2026
Order/Judgement
Munsiff
-
24-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
07-Feb-2026
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
28-Jan-2026
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
17-Jan-2026
For commission report
Munsiff
-
18-Dec-2025
For commission report
Munsiff
-
11-Dec-2025
For commission report
Munsiff
-
20-Nov-2025
For commission report
Munsiff
-
07-Nov-2025
For commission report
Munsiff
-
16-Oct-2025
For commission report
Munsiff
-
09-Oct-2025
Issue notice
Munsiff
-
25-Sep-2025
For commission report
Munsiff
-
16-Sep-2025
For Depositting Batta
Munsiff
-
11-Sep-2025
Order/ Judgement
Munsiff
-
25-Aug-2025
Order/ Judgement
Munsiff
-
20-Aug-2025
For commission report
Munsiff
-
04-Aug-2025
No sitting notified
Munsiff
-
01-Aug-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
17-Jul-2025
Issue notice
Munsiff
-
14-Jul-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
11-Jul-2025
Order/ Judgement
Munsiff
-
05-Jul-2025
Order/Judgement
Munsiff
-
20-Jun-2025
Order/ Judgement
Munsiff
-
09-Jun-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
27-May-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
05-Apr-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
15-Mar-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
24-Feb-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
11-Feb-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
23-Jan-2025
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
16-Dec-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
22-Nov-2024
For Hearing
Munsiff
-
29-Oct-2024
Objection to Cr
Munsiff
-
09-Oct-2024
For commission report
Munsiff
-
06-Aug-2024
Issue notice
Munsiff
-
12-Jul-2024
For commission report
Munsiff
-
28-May-2024
For commission report
Munsiff
-
15-Mar-2024
For commission report
Munsiff
-
29-Feb-2024
For Depositting Batta
Munsiff
-
16-Feb-2024
For Depositting Batta
Munsiff
-
31-Jan-2024
For Depositting Batta
Munsiff
-
18-Jan-2024
For Objection and hearing
Munsiff
-
06-Dec-2023
For hearing on IA
Munsiff
-
24-Nov-2023
Call with IA
Munsiff
-
13-Nov-2023
For Objection and hearing
Munsiff
-
28-Oct-2023
For Objection and hearing
Munsiff
-
14-Sep-2023
For Objection and hearing
Munsiff
-
30-Jun-2023
Return of notice
Munsiff
-
04-Mar-2023
Return of notice
Munsiff
-
20-Jan-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 300002/2023
The Munsiff Court of Thiruvalla passed a final decree in a partition suit, allocating 2.12 ares (plot "GHEDCBAG") to petitioner Seeja Reghunath and 2.02 ares (plot "EFGHE") to respondent Amal Sasidharan, based on a preliminary decree finding both were equal co-owners. The court declined to partition the existing residential building (in the respondent's portion) to avoid affecting its utility, instead equalizing shares through land area and ensuring the petitioner received road frontage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts