M Radhakrishnan vs P.R Sailaja Chandran — 29/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 22 Rule 4. Disposed: Contested--SALE CONFIRMED,EP CLOSED AND ISSUE SALE CERTIFICATE on 08th April 2026.

EP - EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: KLPT120001052025

Case disposed

Filing Number

85/2025

Filing Date

21-08-2025

Registration No

29/2025

Registration Date

25-08-2025

Court

Sub Court, Thiruvalla

Judge

1-SUBJUDGE,THIRUVALLA

Decision Date

08th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--SALE CONFIRMED,EP CLOSED AND ISSUE SALE CERTIFICATE

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 22 Rule 4
Ea/1/2025 Classification : Section M RadhakrishnanPrabha S Nair
Ea/2/2025 Classification : Section M RadhakrishnanPrabha S Nair
Ea/3/2025 Classification : Ea Section M RadhakrishnanP.R Sailaja Chandran
Ea/4/2025 Classification : Petition for Paper Publication Section M RadhakrishnanP.R Sailaja Chandran
Ea/1/2026 Classification : Survey Commission Application Section M RadhakrishnanP.R Sailaja Chandran

Petitioner(s)

M Radhakrishnan

Adv. SURESH A V

Respondent(s)

P.R Sailaja Chandran

Raji Chandran

Rakehi Chandran

Sreejith Chandran

Prabha S Nair

Sarath Nath (Died)

Sarith Nath

M Siivaram Pillai

Hearing History

Judge: 1-SUBJUDGE,THIRUVALLA

08-04-2026

Disposed

04-04-2026

For reports

24-03-2026

Call on

17-03-2026

Call on

11-03-2026

For Steps

Final Orders / Judgements

08-04-2026
Order

The Subordinate Court at Thiruvalla closed the Execution Petition (EP No. 29/2025) as satisfied on 8th April 2026. The court found that the Amin (court officer) reported delivery had been effected, and the decree holder's counsel confirmed the decree was fully satisfied, resulting in closure of the execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Subordinate Court at Thiruvalla closed the Execution Petition (EP No. 29/2025) as satisfied on 8th April 2026. The court found that the Amin (court officer) reported delivery had been effected, and the decree holder's counsel confirmed the decree was fully satisfied, resulting in closure of the execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Sub Court, Thiruvalla All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case