M Radhakrishnan vs P.R Sailaja Chandran — 29/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 22 Rule 4. Disposed: Contested--SALE CONFIRMED,EP CLOSED AND ISSUE SALE CERTIFICATE on 08th April 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLPT120001052025
Filing Number
85/2025
Filing Date
21-Aug-2025
Registration No
29/2025
Registration Date
25-Aug-2025
Court
Sub Court, Thiruvalla
Judge
1-Subjudge,thiruvalla
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--SALE CONFIRMED,EP CLOSED AND ISSUE SALE CERTIFICATE
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M Radhakrishnan
Adv. SURESH A V
Respondent(s)
-
1.P.R Sailaja Chandran
-
2.Raji Chandran
-
3.Rakehi Chandran
-
4.Sreejith Chandran
-
5.Prabha S Nair
-
6.Sarath Nath (Died)
-
7.Sarith Nath
-
8.M Siivaram Pillai
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The Subordinate Court at Thiruvalla closed the Execution Petition (EP No. 29/2025) as satisfied on 8th April 2026. The court found that the Amin (court officer) reported delivery had been effected, and the decree holder's counsel confirmed the decree was fully satisfied, resulting in closure of the execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Disposed
Subjudge,thiruvalla
-
04-Apr-2026
For reports
Subjudge,thiruvalla
-
24-Mar-2026
Call on
Subjudge,thiruvalla
-
17-Mar-2026
Call on
Subjudge,thiruvalla
-
11-Mar-2026
For Steps
Subjudge,thiruvalla
-
24-Feb-2026
Objection
Subjudge,thiruvalla
-
30-Jan-2026
For paper Publication
Subjudge,thiruvalla
-
15-Jan-2026
Declared Holidays
Subjudge,thiruvalla
-
03-Dec-2025
Call on
Subjudge,thiruvalla
-
28-Nov-2025
For Steps
Subjudge,thiruvalla
-
03-Nov-2025
Declared Holidays
Subjudge,thiruvalla
-
13-Oct-2025
For Steps
Subjudge,thiruvalla
-
25-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 29/2025
The Subordinate Court at Thiruvalla closed the Execution Petition (EP No. 29/2025) as satisfied on 8th April 2026. The court found that the Amin (court officer) reported delivery had been effected, and the decree holder's counsel confirmed the decree was fully satisfied, resulting in closure of the execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts