M Sivarama Pillai vs A R Shyleja — 28/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 22 Rule 4. Disposed: Contested--SALE CONFIRMED,EP CLOSED AND ISSUE SALE CERTIFICATE on 08th April 2026.
EP - EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: KLPT120001022025
Filing Number
84/2025
Filing Date
18-Aug-2025
Registration No
28/2025
Registration Date
19-Aug-2025
Court
Sub Court, Thiruvalla
Judge
1-Subjudge,thiruvalla
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--SALE CONFIRMED,EP CLOSED AND ISSUE SALE CERTIFICATE
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M Sivarama Pillai
Adv. SANTHOSH G
Respondent(s)
-
1.A R Shyleja
-
2.Raji Chandran
-
3.Rakhi Chandran
-
4.Sreejith Chandran
-
5.Prabha S Nair
-
6.Sarath Nath (died)
-
7.Sarith Nath
-
8.M Radhakrishnan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The Subordinate Judge at Thiruvalla closed the execution petition (EP No.28/2025) as satisfied on April 8, 2026, after the court-appointed Amin reported that delivery of the decree had been effected. The decree holder's counsel confirmed that the decree was fully satisfied, leading the court to close the execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Disposed
Subjudge,thiruvalla
-
04-Apr-2026
Await report
Subjudge,thiruvalla
-
24-Mar-2026
Delivery of property
Subjudge,thiruvalla
-
17-Mar-2026
Call with IA
Subjudge,thiruvalla
-
11-Mar-2026
For Steps
Subjudge,thiruvalla
-
24-Feb-2026
Objection
Subjudge,thiruvalla
-
22-Jan-2026
Issue notice
Subjudge,thiruvalla
-
20-Dec-2025
Return of notice
Subjudge,thiruvalla
-
19-Nov-2025
Call on
Subjudge,thiruvalla
-
14-Oct-2025
Return of notice
Subjudge,thiruvalla
-
20-Aug-2025
Return of notice
Subjudge,thiruvalla
-
19-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 28/2025
The Subordinate Judge at Thiruvalla closed the execution petition (EP No.28/2025) as satisfied on April 8, 2026, after the court-appointed Amin reported that delivery of the decree had been effected. The decree holder's counsel confirmed that the decree was fully satisfied, leading the court to close the execution proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts