Jayasree vs Amarnadh Advocate - Mohankumar S — 300220/2022

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Section 26,Order 7,Rule 1. Status: Pre trial steps. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLPT090003302022

Pre trial steps

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

Filing Number

300329/2022

Filing Date

04-08-2022

Registration No

300220/2022

Registration Date

04-08-2022

Court

Munsiff Court , Adoor

Judge

1-Munsiff Magistrate

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Section 26,Order 7,Rule 1
Ia/6/2025 Classification : Sanction Petition Section AmarnadhJayasree
Ia/7/2025 Classification : Advance Application Section AmarnadhJayasree

Petitioner(s)

Jayasree

Adv. Lal.S.P

Sujatha

Adv. Lal.S.P

Respondent(s)

Amarnadh Advocate - Mohankumar S

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff Magistrate

08-04-2026

Pre trial steps

04-04-2026

Orders in IA

01-04-2026

For hearing on IA

31-03-2026

For objection and hearing on IA

31-03-2026

Disposed

Interim Orders

08-04-2026
Order
08-04-2026
Order

Case Summary: OS 300220/2022 Court: Munsiff Court, Adoor Date: 8 April 2026 Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiffs' temporary prohibitory injunction petition (IA 1/2022) and made it absolute until suit disposal. The defendant's counter-application (IA 6/2025) to set aside the injunction was dismissed. The defendant is permanently restrained from trespassing on the plaintiffs' properties, using a private 10-link pathway for vehicular access, demolishing a protective boundary wall, or installing gates on the pathway—which the court found exclusively belongs to the property allottees under a 1979 partition deed, not the public municipality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS 300220/2022 Court: Munsiff Court, Adoor Date: 8 April 2026 Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiffs' temporary prohibitory injunction petition (IA 1/2022) and made it absolute until suit disposal. The defendant's counter-application (IA 6/2025) to set aside the injunction was dismissed. The defendant is permanently restrained from trespassing on the plaintiffs' properties, using a private 10-link pathway for vehicular access, demolishing a protective boundary wall, or installing gates on the pathway—which the court found exclusively belongs to the property allottees under a 1979 partition deed, not the public municipality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court , Adoor All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case