Jayasree vs Amarnadh Advocate - Mohankumar S — 300220/2022
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Section 26,Order 7,Rule 1. Status: Pre trial steps. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLPT090003302022
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
300329/2022
Filing Date
04-08-2022
Registration No
300220/2022
Registration Date
04-08-2022
Court
Munsiff Court , Adoor
Judge
1-Munsiff Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jayasree
Adv. Lal.S.P
Sujatha
Adv. Lal.S.P
Respondent(s)
Amarnadh Advocate - Mohankumar S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff Magistrate
Pre trial steps
Orders in IA
For hearing on IA
For objection and hearing on IA
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Pre trial steps |
| 04-04-2026 | Orders in IA |
| 01-04-2026 | For hearing on IA |
| 31-03-2026 | For objection and hearing on IA |
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS 300220/2022 Court: Munsiff Court, Adoor Date: 8 April 2026 Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiffs' temporary prohibitory injunction petition (IA 1/2022) and made it absolute until suit disposal. The defendant's counter-application (IA 6/2025) to set aside the injunction was dismissed. The defendant is permanently restrained from trespassing on the plaintiffs' properties, using a private 10-link pathway for vehicular access, demolishing a protective boundary wall, or installing gates on the pathway—which the court found exclusively belongs to the property allottees under a 1979 partition deed, not the public municipality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS 300220/2022 Court: Munsiff Court, Adoor Date: 8 April 2026 Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiffs' temporary prohibitory injunction petition (IA 1/2022) and made it absolute until suit disposal. The defendant's counter-application (IA 6/2025) to set aside the injunction was dismissed. The defendant is permanently restrained from trespassing on the plaintiffs' properties, using a private 10-link pathway for vehicular access, demolishing a protective boundary wall, or installing gates on the pathway—which the court found exclusively belongs to the property allottees under a 1979 partition deed, not the public municipality. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts