Jose Pappachan vs The State of Kerala Advocate - R.Vijayakumar, R.Vijayakumar — 300411/2011
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section U/s26OrderVIIRule1. Status: Return of summons. Next hearing: 21st May 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLPT090002222011
Next Hearing
21st May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
300411/2011
Filing Date
13-10-2011
Registration No
300411/2011
Registration Date
13-10-2011
Court
Munsiff Court , Adoor
Judge
1-Munsiff Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jose Pappachan
Adv. Sanal George
Sosamma Jose
Adv. Sanal George
Respondent(s)
The State of Kerala Advocate - R.Vijayakumar, R.Vijayakumar
Taluk Tahsildar
Adv. R.Vijayakumar,ALEXANDER PHILIP
Re-survey Superintendent
Adv. R.Vijayakumar,ALEXANDER PHILIP
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff Magistrate
Return of summons
No sitting notified
Return of summons
Return of summons
For Steps
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Return of summons | |
| 27-03-2026 | No sitting notified | |
| 23-03-2026 | Return of summons | |
| 17-03-2026 | Return of summons | |
| 11-03-2026 | For Steps |
Interim Orders
Summary The petition filed by Jose Pappachan and Sosamma Jose to review the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner and Surveyor in IA 2/2022 (dated 04.07.2022) has been dismissed. The court found that the review petition, filed 3 years after the original appointment order and 1.5 years after the commission report was filed, was merely an attempt to delay proceedings. The court held that reviewing the commissioner's appointment after the commission report had already been completed was unfair and unsustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The petition filed by Jose Pappachan and Sosamma Jose to review the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner and Surveyor in IA 2/2022 (dated 04.07.2022) has been dismissed. The court found that the review petition, filed 3 years after the original appointment order and 1.5 years after the commission report was filed, was merely an attempt to delay proceedings. The court held that reviewing the commissioner's appointment after the commission report had already been completed was unfair and unsustainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts