Max value Credit & Investment Ltd vs Syam Shaji — 122/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 36. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

EP - EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: KLPT010016412025

Filing Number

375/2025

Filing Date

02-Jul-2025

Registration No

122/2025

Registration Date

07-Jul-2025

Court

District Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Pathanamthitta

Judge

5-Addl. District And Sessions Judge-II, Pta.

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Section 36

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Max value Credit & Investment Ltd

    Adv. Anoop R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Syam Shaji

  2. 2.Vasantha

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    In Execution Petition No. 122/2025, the District Court of Pathanamthitta closed the execution petition filed by Max Value Credit & Investment Ltd. against debtors Shyam Shaji and Vasantha after the decree holder's counsel withdrew the petition. The court accordingly withdrew the attachment that had been initiated against the debtors' property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-II, Pta.

  4. 19-Jan-2026

    Objection

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-II, Pta.

  5. 21-Nov-2025

    Return of notice

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-II, Pta.

  6. 22-Sep-2025

    Objection

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-II, Pta.

  7. 19-Jul-2025

    Call on

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge-II, Pta.

  8. 08-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 02-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 122/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In Execution Petition No. 122/2025, the District Court of Pathanamthitta closed the execution petition filed by Max Value Credit & Investment Ltd. against debtors Shyam Shaji and Vasantha after the decree holder's counsel withdrew the petition. The court accordingly withdrew the attachment that had been initiated against the debtors' property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case