Muthoot Vehicles and Asset Finance Ltd. vs Saseendrakumari S Advocate - Suku V — 100025/2025
Case under Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section Section9. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
OP(Arb) - ORIGINAL PETITION (ARBITRATION)
CNR: KLPT010007002025
e-Filing Number
20-03-2025
Filing Number
183/2025
Filing Date
20-03-2025
Registration No
100025/2025
Registration Date
21-03-2025
Court
District Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Pathanamthitta
Judge
1-DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, PATHANAMTHITTA
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Muthoot Vehicles and Asset Finance Ltd.
Adv. Harikrishnan T
Respondent(s)
Saseendrakumari S Advocate - Suku V
Manoj K P
Hearing History
Judge: 1-DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, PATHANAMTHITTA
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 19-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 12-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 05-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: OP(Arb) No. 25/2025 Court Decision: The District Court of Pathanamthitta allowed Muthoot Vehicles and Asset Finance Ltd.'s petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding that respondents defaulted on two vehicle loans totaling Rs. 15,76,394.93 with outstanding dues of Rs. 15,16,501.50 and Rs. 59,893.93. The court rejected respondents' claims that they had fully discharged liability, as oral evidence and bank statements failed to substantiate such claims. The court attached the Toyota Etios vehicle (registration KL-03-AC-5955) and appointed an advocate commissioner to repossess and hand it over to the petitioner company, directing the petitioner to initiate arbitration proceedings within 90 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OP(Arb) No. 25/2025 Court Decision: The District Court of Pathanamthitta allowed Muthoot Vehicles and Asset Finance Ltd.'s petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding that respondents defaulted on two vehicle loans totaling Rs. 15,76,394.93 with outstanding dues of Rs. 15,16,501.50 and Rs. 59,893.93. The court rejected respondents' claims that they had fully discharged liability, as oral evidence and bank statements failed to substantiate such claims. The court attached the Toyota Etios vehicle (registration KL-03-AC-5955) and appointed an advocate commissioner to repossess and hand it over to the petitioner company, directing the petitioner to initiate arbitration proceedings within 90 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts