Sarasamma vs The State of Kerala (PP) Advocate - Public Prosecutor — 100017/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
Crl.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: KLPT010002052024
e-Filing Number
01-02-2024
Filing Number
161/2024
Filing Date
01-02-2024
Registration No
100017/2024
Registration Date
01-02-2024
Court
District Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Pathanamthitta
Judge
6-ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-III, PTA.
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
215
Police Station
Pamba Police Station
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sarasamma
Adv. SUDHAKARAN PILLAI M
Respondent(s)
The State of Kerala (PP) Advocate - Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: 6-ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-III, PTA.
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
For further hearing
For further hearing
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 06-03-2026 | For further hearing |
| 04-03-2026 | For further hearing |
| 26-02-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 100017/2024 The Kerala Court of Session partially allowed Sarasamma's appeal, confirming her conviction for wrongful restraint, voluntarily causing hurt, and mischief (IPC §341, 324, 427) but substantially reducing her sentence. While the court found her guilty based on the complainant's credible testimony, it modified harsh imprisonment terms to fines (₹500, ₹2,000, ₹1,000 respectively) with default jail terms, considering her age (69 years) and family relationship with the victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 100017/2024 The Kerala Court of Session partially allowed Sarasamma's appeal, confirming her conviction for wrongful restraint, voluntarily causing hurt, and mischief (IPC §341, 324, 427) but substantially reducing her sentence. While the court found her guilty based on the complainant's credible testimony, it modified harsh imprisonment terms to fines (₹500, ₹2,000, ₹1,000 respectively) with default jail terms, considering her age (69 years) and family relationship with the victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts