State of Kerala (Police) vs Ranjith. V.M. Advocate - MUHAMED SABEER V, MAHESH E K, MAHESH E KMUHAMED SABEER V, — 101020/2024
Case under Ipc \ Section 363, 376 (1),376 (3). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 255 BNSS on 07th May 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLPK330002332024
Filing Number
101020/2024
Filing Date
13-11-2024
Registration No
101020/2024
Registration Date
13-11-2024
Court
Fast Track Special Court Pattambi
Judge
1-Addl.District Judge
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED U/S 255 BNSS
FIR Details
FIR Number
543
Police Station
Shoranur Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Respondent(s)
Ranjith. V.M. Advocate - MUHAMED SABEER V, MAHESH E K, MAHESH E KMUHAMED SABEER V,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Addl.District Judge
Disposed
Call on
Examination of the Accused U/S 351 BNSS
To summon witness
To summon witness
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-04-2026 | Call on |
| 30-03-2026 | Examination of the Accused U/S 351 BNSS |
| 12-03-2026 | To summon witness |
| 23-01-2026 | To summon witness |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Ranjith V.M (SC 1020/2024) The Fast Track Special Court acquitted 24-year-old Ranjith V.M of charges including kidnapping, rape, and POCSO Act violations involving a 15-year-old victim. The court found insufficient evidence after the victim and her mother—the prosecution's key witnesses—both turned hostile, denying the allegations and disowning their police statements. The court concluded that without credible victim testimony and with only police investigative evidence, the charges could not be established beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Kerala v. Ranjith V.M (SC 1020/2024) The Fast Track Special Court acquitted 24-year-old Ranjith V.M of charges including kidnapping, rape, and POCSO Act violations involving a 15-year-old victim. The court found insufficient evidence after the victim and her mother—the prosecution's key witnesses—both turned hostile, denying the allegations and disowning their police statements. The court concluded that without credible victim testimony and with only police investigative evidence, the charges could not be established beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts