State of Kerala (Police) vs SIDHARTH Advocate - GEORGE K C — 8/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 112(2),112(2). Status: For committal. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
Cr.No(PKD-PS-Nenmara) - Nenmara Police Station
CNR: KLPK240062782025
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
27-11-2025
Filing Number
816/2025
Filing Date
22-01-2026
Registration No
8/2026
Registration Date
04-02-2026
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court , Alathur
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
816
Police Station
Nenmara Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Kerala (Police)
Respondent(s)
SIDHARTH Advocate - GEORGE K C
Pramod
Adv. SHANAVAS S,SHANAVAS S
Ramesh
Adv. SHANAVAS S,SHANAVAS S
Sansar
Adv. SHANAVAS S,SHANAVAS S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
For committal
For committal
For committal
For committal
Appearance of Accused
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | For committal | |
| 30-03-2026 | For committal | |
| 23-03-2026 | For committal | |
| 09-03-2026 | For committal | |
| 25-02-2026 | Appearance of Accused |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The petition for interim custody of a seized mobile phone is allowed. The Judicial First Class Magistrate granted interim custody of the mobile phone to petitioner/accused No.4 Sansar, citing that keeping the electronic device idle may damage it. The release is conditional upon executing a ₹1,00,000 bond with two sureties, producing attested photographs with a CD, providing the photographer's certificate, and producing the phone as required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The petition for interim custody of a seized mobile phone is allowed. The Judicial First Class Magistrate granted interim custody of the mobile phone to petitioner/accused No.4 Sansar, citing that keeping the electronic device idle may damage it. The release is conditional upon executing a ₹1,00,000 bond with two sureties, producing attested photographs with a CD, providing the photographer's certificate, and producing the phone as required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts