State of Kerala (Police) vs SIDHARTH Advocate - GEORGE K C — 8/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 112(2),112(2). Status: For committal. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

For committal Next hearing 17-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Cr.No(PKD-PS-Nenmara) - Nenmara Police Station

CNR: KLPK240062782025

e-Filing Number

27-11-2025

Filing Number

816/2025

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

8/2026

Registration Date

04-Feb-2026

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court , Alathur

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

816

Police Station

Nenmara Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 112(2),112(2)
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 20(b)(ii)(A),27(b),20(b)(ii)(A),27(b),25,29
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act Section 77

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala (Police)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SIDHARTH Advocate - GEORGE K C

  2. 2.Pramod

    Adv. SHANAVAS S,SHANAVAS S

  3. 3.Ramesh

    Adv. SHANAVAS S,SHANAVAS S

  4. 4.Sansar

    Adv. SHANAVAS S,SHANAVAS S

Case History

  1. 17-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    For committal

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    For committal

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    For committal

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    For committal

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    Interim OrderView PDF

    SUMMARY: The petition for interim custody of a seized mobile phone is allowed. The Judicial First Class Magistrate granted interim custody of the mobile phone to petitioner/accused No.4 Sansar, citing that keeping the electronic device idle may damage it. The release is conditional upon executing a ₹1,00,000 bond with two sureties, producing attested photographs with a CD, providing the photographer's certificate, and producing the phone as required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Appearance of Accused

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Orders in C.mp

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    For committal

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  10. 04-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 8/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The petition for interim custody of a seized mobile phone is allowed. The Judicial First Class Magistrate granted interim custody of the mobile phone to petitioner/accused No.4 Sansar, citing that keeping the electronic device idle may damage it. The release is conditional upon executing a ₹1,00,000 bond with two sureties, producing attested photographs with a CD, providing the photographer's certificate, and producing the phone as required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case