State of Kerala (Police) vs Rejeesh — 3155/2025

Case under Abkari (Amendment) Act, 1969 Section 15(c),63. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr.No(PKD-PS-Nenmara) - Nenmara Police Station

CNR: KLPK240052332025

e-Filing Number

08-11-2025

Filing Number

770/2025

Filing Date

11-Nov-2025

Registration No

3155/2025

Registration Date

14-Nov-2025

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court , Alathur

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

770

Police Station

Nenmara Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Abkari (Amendment) Act, 1969 Section 15(c),63

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala (Police)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rejeesh

  2. 2.Renjith

  3. 3.Mahesh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: ST 3155/2025 The Judicial First Class Magistrate found all three accused (Rejeesh, Renjith, and Mahesh) guilty of violating Section 15(c),63 of the Abkari (Amendment) Act, 1969, after they pleaded guilty. The court sentenced each accused to pay a fine of Rs. 500, with an alternative of five days simple imprisonment in default of payment, considering their repentance and taking a lenient view. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Repeat Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  5. 20-Dec-2025

    Repeat Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  6. 14-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3155/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ST 3155/2025 The Judicial First Class Magistrate found all three accused (Rejeesh, Renjith, and Mahesh) guilty of violating Section 15(c),63 of the Abkari (Amendment) Act, 1969, after they pleaded guilty. The court sentenced each accused to pay a fine of Rs. 500, with an alternative of five days simple imprisonment in default of payment, considering their repentance and taking a lenient view. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case