State of Kerala (Police) vs Sudheesh — 2653/2025

Case under Gaming Act, 1960 Section 15. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr.No(PKD-PS-Alathur) - Alathur Police Station

CNR: KLPK240044372025

e-Filing Number

07-08-2025

Filing Number

896/2025

Filing Date

29-Sep-2025

Registration No

2653/2025

Registration Date

29-Sep-2025

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court , Alathur

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

896

Police Station

Alathur Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gaming Act, 1960 Section 15

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala (Police)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sudheesh

  2. 2.Pradeep

  3. 3.Nasar

  4. 4.Dhanesh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The Alathur Judicial First Class Magistrate found all four accused (Sudheesh, Pradeep, Nasar, and Dhanesh) guilty of violating Section 15 of the Gaming Act, 1960, after they pleaded guilty to gambling charges. The court sentenced each accused to pay a fine of Rs. 100, with one day simple imprisonment as default punishment, taking a lenient view given their repentance and rejecting application of the Probation of Offenders Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  4. 27-Jan-2026

    Repeat Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  5. 21-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 29-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2653/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Alathur Judicial First Class Magistrate found all four accused (Sudheesh, Pradeep, Nasar, and Dhanesh) guilty of violating Section 15 of the Gaming Act, 1960, after they pleaded guilty to gambling charges. The court sentenced each accused to pay a fine of Rs. 100, with one day simple imprisonment as default punishment, taking a lenient view given their repentance and rejecting application of the Probation of Offenders Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case