State of Kerala (Police) vs Vinod V — 2568/2025

Case under Abkari (Amendment) Act, 1969 Section 15 c. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cr.No(PKD-PS-Alathur) - Alathur Police Station

CNR: KLPK240042762025

e-Filing Number

14-09-2025

Filing Number

1035/2025

Filing Date

23-Sep-2025

Registration No

2568/2025

Registration Date

23-Sep-2025

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court , Alathur

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1035

Police Station

Alathur Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Abkari (Amendment) Act, 1969 Section 15 c

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Kerala (Police)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vinod V

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: ST 2568/2025 The Alathur Judicial First Class Magistrate found Vinod V guilty of violating Section 15(c) of the Abkari (Amendment) Act, 1969, after he pleaded guilty to the charges. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500, with a default provision of four days simple imprisonment, taking a lenient view given the accused's repentance and finding him unsuitable for probation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  4. 17-Jan-2026

    Repeat Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  5. 18-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2568/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ST 2568/2025 The Alathur Judicial First Class Magistrate found Vinod V guilty of violating Section 15(c) of the Abkari (Amendment) Act, 1969, after he pleaded guilty to the charges. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 500, with a default provision of four days simple imprisonment, taking a lenient view given the accused's repentance and finding him unsuitable for probation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case