FRO NELLIYAMPATHY vs SENTHANIZHUKANNAN Advocate - JACOB MATHEW, JACOB MATHEW — 900589/2016
Case under Wild Life Protection Act Section 2(2),2(14),2(31),39,40,50,51ANDSEC47(I),I,F(I),G(3). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 31st March 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLPK240020742016
Filing Number
900589/2016
Filing Date
25-May-2016
Registration No
900589/2016
Registration Date
25-May-2016
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court , Alathur
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
31-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 30-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
9
Police Station
Nelliampathy Forest Range Office
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.FRO NELLIYAMPATHY
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SENTHANIZHUKANNAN Advocate - JACOB MATHEW, JACOB MATHEW
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
31-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
CASE SUMMARY: 900589/2016 The court acquitted accused Senthamil Kannan of wildlife protection and forest law violations after finding critical gaps in the prosecution's case. Though police seized two deer horns and seven sandalwood pieces from his house in May 2014, the court held that the prosecution failed to prove their authenticity through scientific examination—relying instead on subjective visual and smell-based identification by forest officials. Additionally, the court found serious defects in the chain of custody (items were not properly sealed or packed), failed to establish conscious possession (items were found on a shelf, not directly with the accused), and lacked evidence linking the accused to any illegal hunting or sandalwood cutting. The court ruled that suspicion cannot replace proof in criminal trials and acquitted the accused on March 31, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
30-Mar-2026
Order/ Judgement
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
26-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
23-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
13-Jan-2026
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
18-Nov-2025
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
07-Oct-2025
BW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
01-Jul-2025
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
28-Jun-2025
Call with C.mp
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
21-Jun-2025
Call with C.mp
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
17-Jun-2025
Call with C.mp
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
09-Jun-2025
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
15-May-2025
Further evidence
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
04-Apr-2025
NBW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
12-Feb-2025
NBW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
20-Jan-2025
NBW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
16-Dec-2024
NBW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
17-Oct-2024
NBW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
23-Aug-2024
NBW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
09-Jul-2024
NBW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
06-Jun-2024
NBW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
17-Apr-2024
BW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
06-Feb-2024
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
16-Nov-2023
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
19-Sep-2023
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
13-Jul-2023
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
14-Jun-2023
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
03-Mar-2023
BW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
20-Jan-2023
Produce Witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
20-Oct-2022
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
15-Sep-2022
For framing charge
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
23-Aug-2022
Hearing on Charge
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
27-Jun-2022
BW to cws
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
19-Mar-2022
Repeat Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
09-Feb-2022
Repeat Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
21-Dec-2021
Repeat Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
16-Nov-2021
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
26-Oct-2021
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
23-Sep-2021
Repeat Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
10-Aug-2021
Repeat Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
01-Jul-2021
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
23-Apr-2021
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
20-Feb-2021
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
15-Jan-2021
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
27-Nov-2020
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
30-Sep-2020
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
17-Feb-2020
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
30-Sep-2019
To summon witness
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
24-Jul-2019
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
10-May-2019
Bound over
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
30-Jan-2019
Bound over
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
09-Nov-2018
Issue Summons
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
06-Jul-2018
No sitting notified
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
31-Mar-2018
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
18-Dec-2017
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
16-Jun-2017
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
16-Apr-2017
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
16-Nov-2016
Call on
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
16-Aug-2016
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-May-2016
Case filed
Registration No. 900589/2016
CASE SUMMARY: 900589/2016 The court acquitted accused Senthamil Kannan of wildlife protection and forest law violations after finding critical gaps in the prosecution's case. Though police seized two deer horns and seven sandalwood pieces from his house in May 2014, the court held that the prosecution failed to prove their authenticity through scientific examination—relying instead on subjective visual and smell-based identification by forest officials. Additionally, the court found serious defects in the chain of custody (items were not properly sealed or packed), failed to establish conscious possession (items were found on a shelf, not directly with the accused), and lacked evidence linking the accused to any illegal hunting or sandalwood cutting. The court ruled that suspicion cannot replace proof in criminal trials and acquitted the accused on March 31, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts