Praseetha B vs Anoop Kumar Advocate - K.M. Manojkumar — 18/2026

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 18, 21. Status: For Mediation Report. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

For Mediation Report Next hearing 23-Jun-2026 this date has passed

MC - MISCELLANEOUS & MAINTENANCE CASE

CNR: KLPK240009382026

Filing Number

18/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

18/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court , Alathur

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 18, 21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Praseetha B

    Adv. SUMITHRA K

  2. 2.Diya

    Adv. SUMITHRA K

  3. 3.Anay A

    Adv. SUMITHRA K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Anoop Kumar Advocate - K.M. Manojkumar

Case History

  1. 23-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-May-2026

    For Mediation Report

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Referred to Mediator

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Referred to Mediator

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: The petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, was allowed in part. An ad-interim protection order was granted restraining the respondent Anoop Kumar from entering the first petitioner's house, threatening her or relatives via phone, entering her daughter's school, and forcibly taking the minor son without consent. Police assistance was directed for implementation of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 18/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, was allowed in part. An ad-interim protection order was granted restraining the respondent Anoop Kumar from entering the first petitioner's house, threatening her or relatives via phone, entering her daughter's school, and forcibly taking the minor son without consent. Police assistance was directed for implementation of the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case