State of Kerala (Police) vs Raguram — 98/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281,281. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED on 14th March 2026.
Cr.No(PKD-PS-Alathur) - Alathur Police Station
CNR: KLPK240000252026
e-Filing Number
01-01-2026
Filing Number
12/2026
Filing Date
05-Jan-2026
Registration No
98/2026
Registration Date
09-Jan-2026
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court , Alathur
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
12
Police Station
Alathur Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Kerala (Police)
Respondent(s)
-
1.Raguram
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary (ST 98/2026): Raguram was convicted of offences under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act (rash/negligent driving) and Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (rash act endangering life). The accused pleaded guilty, and the magistrate accepted the plea as voluntary. Considering the accused's remorse and repentance, the court imposed lenient sentences: a fine of Rs. 500 for the BNS offence (with five days simple imprisonment in default) and imprisonment till the rising of court for the MVA offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial First Class Magistrate
-
09-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 98/2026
Case Summary (ST 98/2026): Raguram was convicted of offences under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act (rash/negligent driving) and Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (rash act endangering life). The accused pleaded guilty, and the magistrate accepted the plea as voluntary. Considering the accused's remorse and repentance, the court imposed lenient sentences: a fine of Rs. 500 for the BNS offence (with five days simple imprisonment in default) and imprisonment till the rising of court for the MVA offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts