Balasubramanian vs Valliamma Advocate - John John — 300143/2018
Status: For Steps. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLPK230002822018
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
300143/2018
Filing Date
18-04-2018
Registration No
300143/2018
Registration Date
18-04-2018
Court
Munsiff Court , Alathur
Judge
1-Munsiff
Petitioner(s)
Balasubramanian
Adv. K.R giri iyer
Respondent(s)
Valliamma Advocate - John John
Rukmini
Adv. John John
Babu
Adv. John John
Rajagopalan
Adv. John John
Rajendran
Adv. John John
Vella amma
Adv. Mintu Mol Antony
Ammini
Adv. John John
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff
For Steps
For Steps
For Steps
Issue summons to defendants. For return of Summons
For Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | For Steps |
| 14-01-2026 | For Steps |
| 08-12-2025 | For Steps |
| 31-10-2025 | Issue summons to defendants. For return of Summons |
| 12-09-2025 | For Steps |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 300143/2018 (O.S.143/2018) In this partition suit heard in the Munsiff Court of Alathur on November 15, 2022, plaintiff Balasubramanian sought division of jointly-held family properties into 144 equal shares, claiming entitlement to 59/144 shares. The court decreed the suit in the plaintiff's favor, passing a preliminary decree dividing the scheduled properties into 144 equal shares and awarding the plaintiff 59/144 shares with separate right and possession. All seven defendants were absent and the case was heard ex parte based on the plaintiff's unquestioned testimony and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 300143/2018 (O.S.143/2018) In this partition suit heard in the Munsiff Court of Alathur on November 15, 2022, plaintiff Balasubramanian sought division of jointly-held family properties into 144 equal shares, claiming entitlement to 59/144 shares. The court decreed the suit in the plaintiff's favor, passing a preliminary decree dividing the scheduled properties into 144 equal shares and awarding the plaintiff 59/144 shares with separate right and possession. All seven defendants were absent and the case was heard ex parte based on the plaintiff's unquestioned testimony and documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts