Muhammed vs Kattubhavan Advocate - Muhammed Rafi.A.K — 300088/2020

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 21. Status: Await report. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Await report Next hearing 09-Jun-2026 this date has passed

EP - EXECUTION PETITION

CNR: KLPK230002752020

Filing Number

300088/2020

Filing Date

21-May-2020

Registration No

300088/2020

Registration Date

21-May-2020

Court

Munsiff Court , Alathur

Judge

1-Munsiff

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Muhammed

    Adv. V.N.Sheeja

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kattubhavan Advocate - Muhammed Rafi.A.K

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Await report

    Munsiff

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Await report

    Munsiff

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Report on mediation

    Munsiff

  8. 27-Jan-2026

    Await report

    Munsiff

  9. 20-Jan-2026

    Await report

    Munsiff

  10. 01-Jan-2026

    Await report

    Munsiff

  11. 16-Dec-2025

    Await report

    Munsiff

  12. 08-Dec-2025

    Await report

    Munsiff

  13. 29-Nov-2025

    Await report

    Munsiff

  14. 19-Nov-2025

    For reports

    Munsiff

  15. 11-Nov-2025

    Appearance Of Parties

    Munsiff

  16. 06-Nov-2025

    For hearing Ea

    Munsiff

  17. 25-Oct-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  18. 23-Oct-2025

    For hearing Ea

    Munsiff

  19. 22-Sep-2025

    For hearing Ea

    Munsiff

  20. 18-Aug-2025

    For hearing Ea

    Munsiff

  21. 01-Aug-2025

    For hearing Ea

    Munsiff

  22. 23-Jun-2025

    For hearing Ea

    Munsiff

  23. 10-Apr-2025

    For hearing Ea

    Munsiff

  24. 06-Mar-2025

    For hearing Ea

    Munsiff

  25. 28-Feb-2025

    For hearing Ea

    Munsiff

  26. 25-Feb-2025

    For hearing Ea

    Munsiff

  27. 22-Feb-2025

    Objection to Cr

    Munsiff

  28. 17-Feb-2025

    Objection to Cr

    Munsiff

  29. 15-Jan-2025

    For commission report

    Munsiff

  30. 09-Dec-2024

    For commission report

    Munsiff

  31. 08-Nov-2024

    For commission report

    Munsiff

  32. 05-Oct-2024

    For commission report

    Munsiff

  33. 14-Aug-2024

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff

  34. 26-Jul-2024

    For Counter

    Munsiff

  35. 06-Jul-2024

    For Counter

    Munsiff

  36. 21-Jun-2024

    For Counter

    Munsiff

  37. 06-Jun-2024

    For Counter

    Munsiff

  38. 02-Apr-2024

    For Counter

    Munsiff

  39. 25-Mar-2024

    For Counter in IA

    Munsiff

  40. 15-Mar-2024

    For Counter in IA

    Munsiff

  41. 15-Feb-2024

    For Steps

    Munsiff

  42. 03-Feb-2024

    For Steps

    Munsiff

  43. 24-Jan-2024

    Appearance Of Parties

    Munsiff

  44. 23-Jan-2024

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  45. 12-Jan-2024

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  46. 22-Dec-2023

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  47. 15-Dec-2023

    Delivery of property

    Munsiff

  48. 30-Nov-2023

    Delivery of property

    Munsiff

  49. 27-Nov-2023

    Delivery of property

    Munsiff

  50. 15-Nov-2023

    Delivery of property

    Munsiff

  51. 27-Oct-2023

    Delivery of property

    Munsiff

  52. 25-Oct-2023

    Delivery of property

    Munsiff

  53. 04-Oct-2023

    Delivery of property

    Munsiff

  54. 21-Sep-2023

    Delivery of property

    Munsiff

  55. 25-Aug-2023

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: Execution Petition No. 88/2020 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED The Munsiff Court of Alathur permitted petitioner Muhammed to construct a granite wall on the eastern boundary of his property under court supervision via an appointed Amin (court commissioner). The court held that constructing the wall was necessary to enforce the petitioner's earlier decree of permanent prohibitory injunction against respondent Kattubavan, which restrained the respondent from obstructing the petitioner's peaceful possession and demolishing the eastern granite foundation. The court rejected the respondent's objection that no executable decree existed for wall construction, finding that prohibitory injunctions can be enforced to a practicable extent under Order XXI Rule 32(5) CPC to enable the decree holder to enjoy the fruits of the judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  56. 25-Aug-2023

    Delivery of property

    Munsiff

  57. 23-Aug-2023

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff

  58. 16-Aug-2023

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff

  59. 02-Aug-2023

    For further hearing

    Munsiff

  60. 12-Jul-2023

    For further hearing

    Munsiff

  61. 04-Jul-2023

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  62. 23-Jun-2023

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  63. 02-Jun-2023

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  64. 14-Mar-2023

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  65. 22-Feb-2023

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  66. 17-Feb-2023

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff

  67. 09-Feb-2023

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff

  68. 06-Feb-2023

    Order/Judgement

    Munsiff

  69. 22-Dec-2022

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  70. 26-Nov-2022

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  71. 28-Sep-2022

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  72. 22-Jul-2022

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  73. 30-Jun-2022

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  74. 21-May-2022

    For Hearing

    Munsiff

  75. 15-Feb-2022

    Issue notice

    Munsiff

  76. 24-Nov-2021

    Issue notice

    Munsiff

  77. 04-Oct-2021

    Issue notice

    Munsiff

  78. 03-Aug-2021

    Issue notice

    Munsiff

  79. 03-Jun-2021

    Issue notice

    Munsiff

  80. 17-Mar-2021

    Issue notice

    Munsiff

  81. 02-Feb-2021

    Issue notice

    Munsiff

  82. 12-Jan-2021

    Issue notice

    Munsiff

  83. 23-Nov-2020

    Issue notice

    Munsiff

  84. 07-Oct-2020

    Issue notice

    Munsiff

  85. 06-Jul-2020

    Issue notice

    Munsiff

  86. 21-May-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  87. 21-May-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 300088/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Execution Petition No. 88/2020 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED The Munsiff Court of Alathur permitted petitioner Muhammed to construct a granite wall on the eastern boundary of his property under court supervision via an appointed Amin (court commissioner). The court held that constructing the wall was necessary to enforce the petitioner's earlier decree of permanent prohibitory injunction against respondent Kattubavan, which restrained the respondent from obstructing the petitioner's peaceful possession and demolishing the eastern granite foundation. The court rejected the respondent's objection that no executable decree existed for wall construction, finding that prohibitory injunctions can be enforced to a practicable extent under Order XXI Rule 32(5) CPC to enable the decree holder to enjoy the fruits of the judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case