SI of Meenakshipuram PS vs Devaraj s/o Mayilswami Advocate - PRABHU D — 1880/2025

Case under Kerala Abkari Act Section 15(c),63. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

ST - SUMMARY TRIAL

CNR: KLPK220029352025

Filing Number

2933/2025

Filing Date

27-Jun-2025

Registration No

1880/2025

Registration Date

27-Jun-2025

Court

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Chittur

Judge

1-Judicial First Class Magistrate

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

391

Police Station

Meenakshipuram Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Kerala Abkari Act Section 15(c),63

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SI of Meenakshipuram PS (Police Station)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Devaraj s/o Mayilswami Advocate - PRABHU D

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Summary: In Case ST 1880/2025, the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court at Chittur convicted Devaraj s/o Mayilswami for violations under Sections 15(c) and 63 of the Kerala Abkari Act. The accused pleaded guilty, and the court accepted the plea as voluntary. He was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000, with an alternative of 10 days simple imprisonment in case of default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  4. 07-Nov-2025

    Repeat Summons

    Judicial First Class Magistrate

  5. 16-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1880/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Case ST 1880/2025, the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court at Chittur convicted Devaraj s/o Mayilswami for violations under Sections 15(c) and 63 of the Kerala Abkari Act. The accused pleaded guilty, and the court accepted the plea as voluntary. He was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000, with an alternative of 10 days simple imprisonment in case of default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case