Lakshmi Rep. by PAH Prameela vs Arjunan and others Advocate - PRABHU DHANDAPANI — 339/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section S26O7R1. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST on 19th March 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLPK210005902022
Filing Number
588/2022
Filing Date
19-09-2022
Registration No
339/2022
Registration Date
19-09-2022
Court
Munsiff Court, Chittur
Judge
1-Munsiff
Decision Date
19th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lakshmi Rep. by PAH Prameela
Adv. M SASEENDRAN
Respondent(s)
Arjunan and others Advocate - PRABHU DHANDAPANI
Padmini
Adv. PRABHU DHANDAPANI
Leelavathy
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Issues
For commission report
For Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 24-01-2026 | Issues |
| 07-01-2026 | For commission report |
| 12-12-2025 | For Steps |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 339/2022 The Munsiff Court of Chittur granted a permanent prohibitory injunction in favor of Lakshmi (represented by power of attorney holder Prameela) against her brother Arjunan, his wife Padmini, and sister Leelavathy. The court fixed property boundaries based on a 1957 Partition Deed and 1977 Purchase Certificate, and restrained defendants from trespassing or obstructing the plaintiff's peaceful possession. The court relied on unchallenged affidavit evidence and survey reports, with defendants defaulting by failing to file written statements, and awarded costs against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 339/2022 The Munsiff Court of Chittur granted a permanent prohibitory injunction in favor of Lakshmi (represented by power of attorney holder Prameela) against her brother Arjunan, his wife Padmini, and sister Leelavathy. The court fixed property boundaries based on a 1957 Partition Deed and 1977 Purchase Certificate, and restrained defendants from trespassing or obstructing the plaintiff's peaceful possession. The court relied on unchallenged affidavit evidence and survey reports, with defendants defaulting by failing to file written statements, and awarded costs against them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts