V.G. Sarada vs Raghava Varrier — 500018/2017
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Section 26, Order 7, Rule1. Status: For Counter. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLPK190000212017
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
500018/2017
Filing Date
27-01-2017
Registration No
500018/2017
Registration Date
27-01-2017
Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court, Mannarkkad
Judge
1-Munsiff Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
V.G. Sarada
Adv. K.R. Giri Iyer, K.R. Giri Iyer
Respondent(s)
Raghava Varrier
Taluk Thahasildar
Rajeev
Ramesh
Dasan
Supple 6 Appukutty Gupthan
Supple 7 K Girishan
Supple 8 Udayakumar
Supple 9 Ayyappan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff Magistrate
For Counter
For Counter
For Counter
For Counter
For Counter
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-05-2026 | For Counter |
| 08-04-2026 | For Counter |
| 30-03-2026 | For Counter |
| 19-03-2026 | For Counter |
| 12-03-2026 | For Counter |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: V.G. Sarada v. Raghava Varrier and Others (500018/2017) Outcome: The court allowed both interlocutory applications (IA 121/2025 and IA 122/2025). The Munsiff-Magistrate permitted the plaintiff to implead the legal representatives of the deceased Defendant No. 1 as supplemental defendants (D10-D14) and approved the consequential amendment to the plaint. The court ordered summons to be issued to the legal representatives and directed they be given an opportunity to set aside the ex parte order against the original defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: V.G. Sarada v. Raghava Varrier and Others (500018/2017) Outcome: The court allowed both interlocutory applications (IA 121/2025 and IA 122/2025). The Munsiff-Magistrate permitted the plaintiff to implead the legal representatives of the deceased Defendant No. 1 as supplemental defendants (D10-D14) and approved the consequential amendment to the plaint. The court ordered summons to be issued to the legal representatives and directed they be given an opportunity to set aside the ex parte order against the original defendant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts