Rugmini.K.R vs Sudhakaran Advocate - MUHAMMED ALI MATTAMTHADAM, MUHAMMED ALI MATTAMTHADAM — 700152/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,447,427r/w149. Disposed: Contested--AQUITTED U/S 235 CR.PC on 23rd April 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: KLPK180000362023

Filing Number

700035/2023

Filing Date

16-Feb-2023

Registration No

700152/2023

Registration Date

16-Feb-2023

Court

Special Court for SC ST cases Mannarkkad

Judge

1-Special Judge

Decision Date

23-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--AQUITTED U/S 235 CR.PC

Last updated 30-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

80

Police Station

Sholayur PS

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,323,447,427r/w149
Sc/st(prevention of Attrocities) Act 1989\ Section 3(1)(s),3(2)(va)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rugmini.K.R

    Adv. PP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sudhakaran Advocate - MUHAMMED ALI MATTAMTHADAM, MUHAMMED ALI MATTAMTHADAM

  2. 2.Firoz

    Adv. MUHAMMED ALI MATTAMTHADAM,MUHAMMED NOUFAL K

  3. 3.Shemeer

    Adv. MUHAMMED ALI MATTAMTHADAM,MUHAMMED NOUFAL K

  4. 4.Harshad

    Adv. MUHAMMED ALI MATTAMTHADAM,MUHAMMED NOUFAL K

  5. 5.Aboobakker,

    Adv. MUHAMMED ALI MATTAMTHADAM,MUHAMMED NOUFAL K

  6. 6.Sidhik

    Adv. MUHAMMED ALI MATTAMTHADAM,MUHAMMED NOUFAL K

  7. 7.Sulaiman

    Adv. MUHAMMED ALI MATTAMTHADAM,MUHAMMED NOUFAL K

  8. 8.Mallika

    Adv. MUHAMMED ALI MATTAMTHADAM,MUHAMMED NOUFAL K

  9. 9.Sebiya

    Adv. MUHAMMED ALI MATTAMTHADAM,MUHAMMED NOUFAL K

  10. 10.Selma

    Adv. MUHAMMED ALI MATTAMTHADAM,MUHAMMED NOUFAL K

  11. 11.Fareedha

    Adv. MUHAMMED ALI MATTAMTHADAM,MUHAMMED NOUFAL K

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 152/2023 Court Decision: All 11 accused were acquitted of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 447, 427 r/w 34 and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act sections 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(va). Key Reasoning: The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because: (1) the caste identity of the actual victims (the complainant's parents) was not established with documentary evidence—critical for SC/ST Act charges; (2) key witness evidence was inconsistent and contradicted by defense witness testimony; (3) the underlying dispute was civil in nature involving a long-standing property/pathway rights dispute, making criminal trespass charges unfounded; and (4) conflicting witness accounts created reasonable doubt favoring the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Special Judge

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Special Judge

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    For further hearing

    Special Judge

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Special Judge

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Examination of the Accused U/S 313 Cr.PC

    Special Judge

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    Issue bailable warrant to witness

    Special Judge

  9. 23-Feb-2026

    For Examination of Witness

    Special Judge

  10. 20-Feb-2026

    for evidence

    Special Judge

  11. 22-Jan-2026

    Summons to witness

    Special Judge

  12. 19-Dec-2025

    for trial

    Special Judge

  13. 20-Nov-2025

    for trial

    Special Judge

  14. 18-Oct-2025

    Call on

    Special Judge

  15. 12-Sep-2025

    for trial

    Special Judge

  16. 25-Aug-2025

    Disposed

    Special Judge

  17. 23-Aug-2025

    For return of summons

    Special Judge

  18. 22-Jul-2025

    No sitting notified

    Special Judge

  19. 18-Jun-2025

    Summons to witness

    Special Judge

  20. 04-Jun-2025

    for trial

    Special Judge

  21. 23-May-2025

    Call on

    Special Judge

  22. 05-Apr-2025

    repeat NBW

    Special Judge

  23. 27-Mar-2025

    Issue NBW

    Special Judge

  24. 15-Feb-2025

    Await Counter Case

    Special Judge

  25. 31-Jan-2025

    Call on

    Special Judge

  26. 24-Dec-2024

    Call on

    Special Judge

  27. 16-Nov-2024

    Call on

    Special Judge

  28. 08-Oct-2024

    Call on

    Special Judge

  29. 12-Jul-2024

    Issue Summons

    Special Judge

  30. 22-May-2024

    for trial

    Special Judge

  31. 16-Apr-2024

    For framing charge

    Special Judge

  32. 04-Mar-2024

    For framing charge

    Special Judge

  33. 27-Jan-2024

    No sitting notified

    Special Judge

  34. 22-Nov-2023

    For framing of charge

    Special Judge

  35. 03-Oct-2023

    For framing of charge

    Special Judge

  36. 05-Aug-2023

    For hearing and framing charge

    Special Judge

  37. 20-Jun-2023

    For hearing and framing charge

    Special Judge

  38. 31-Mar-2023

    For hearing and framing charge

    Special Judge

  39. 30-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 16-Feb-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 700152/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 152/2023 Court Decision: All 11 accused were acquitted of charges under IPC sections 341, 323, 447, 427 r/w 34 and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act sections 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(va). Key Reasoning: The court found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, primarily because: (1) the caste identity of the actual victims (the complainant's parents) was not established with documentary evidence—critical for SC/ST Act charges; (2) key witness evidence was inconsistent and contradicted by defense witness testimony; (3) the underlying dispute was civil in nature involving a long-standing property/pathway rights dispute, making criminal trespass charges unfounded; and (4) conflicting witness accounts created reasonable doubt favoring the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case