M.P.Moideen vs Manoj george — 1100649/2016
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th May 2026.
CC - CALENDAR CASE
CNR: KLPK170012062016
Filing Number
1102595/2016
Filing Date
06-06-2016
Registration No
1100649/2016
Registration Date
06-06-2016
Court
Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Pattambi
Judge
1-Judicial First Class Magistrate,Pattambi
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.P.Moideen
Respondent(s)
Manoj george
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judicial First Class Magistrate,Pattambi
Disposed
Order/ Judgement
Order/ Judgement
For further hearing
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-05-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 30-04-2026 | Order/ Judgement |
| 27-04-2026 | For further hearing |
| 21-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: M.P. Moideen v. Manoj George (1100649/2016) The court acquitted accused Manoj George of cheque dishonour charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Though the complainant established the cheque was dishonoured, he failed to prove a legally enforceable debt existed, as he could not recall transaction details, provided no documentary evidence, and admitted never witnessing the cheque's execution. The accused successfully raised a probable defence that the cheque originated from an unrelated transaction, creating reasonable doubt about the debt's legitimacy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: M.P. Moideen v. Manoj George (1100649/2016) The court acquitted accused Manoj George of cheque dishonour charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Though the complainant established the cheque was dishonoured, he failed to prove a legally enforceable debt existed, as he could not recall transaction details, provided no documentary evidence, and admitted never witnessing the cheque's execution. The accused successfully raised a probable defence that the cheque originated from an unrelated transaction, creating reasonable doubt about the debt's legitimacy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts