Parameswaran Nair vs Vasundaradevi — 1100172/2014

Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26R7O1. Status: For further hearing. Next hearing: 18th May 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLPK160002312014

For further hearing

Next Hearing

18th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1100172/2014

Filing Date

14-08-2014

Registration No

1100172/2014

Registration Date

14-08-2014

Court

Munsiff Magistrate Court, Pattambi

Judge

1-Munsiff-Magistrate

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section 26R7O1
IA/1/2025 Classification : Obstruction Petition Section Parameswaran Nair
IA/1/2026 Classification : Delay Condonation Application Section Parameswaran NairVasundaradevi
IA/2/2026 Classification : Delay Condonation Application Section Parameswaran NairVasundaradevi
IA/3/2026 Classification : Delay Condonation Application Section Parameswaran NairVasundaradevi
IA/4/2026 Classification : Delay Condonation Application Section Parameswaran NairSaritha

Petitioner(s)

Parameswaran Nair

Adv. P.Manoj

Sankharanarayanan

Adv. P.manoj

Respondent(s)

Vasundaradevi

Sudheesh

Saritha

Kuttan

Aravindhan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Munsiff-Magistrate

10-04-2026

For further hearing

30-03-2026

For further hearing

09-03-2026

FOR HEARING

02-03-2026

For commission report

27-02-2026

Defence Evidence

Interim Orders

17-11-2016
Judgement

Summary: Original Suit No. 172/2014 for mandatory and permanent injunction filed by Parameswaran Nair and Sankaranarayanan against five defendants was dismissed for default on November 17, 2016. The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff's counsel reported no instruction at the final hearing, and costs were awarded against the plaintiffs in favor of the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Original Suit No. 172/2014 for mandatory and permanent injunction filed by Parameswaran Nair and Sankaranarayanan against five defendants was dismissed for default on November 17, 2016. The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff's counsel reported no instruction at the final hearing, and costs were awarded against the plaintiffs in favor of the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Magistrate Court, Pattambi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case