rafeek vs Azees.k Advocate - RAJESH V — 11/2026
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Order 7 Rule1. Status: Stayed. Call on. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLPK160000142026
Filing Number
10/2026
Filing Date
15-Jan-2026
Registration No
11/2026
Registration Date
16-Jan-2026
Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court, Pattambi
Judge
1-Munsiff-Magistrate
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.rafeek
Adv. ABIDA P
Respondent(s)
-
1.Azees.k Advocate - RAJESH V
Case History
-
01-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Mar-2026
Stayed. Call on
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
09-Mar-2026
Stayed. Call on
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
02-Mar-2026
Produce stay order
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
26-Feb-2026
Call with IA
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
23-Feb-2026
Call with IA
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
17-Feb-2026
JudgementView PDF
SUMMARY The Court of the Munsiff-Magistrate, Pattambi allowed the plaintiff's interim injunction petition (IA 02/2026) and dismissed the defendant's counter-petition (IA 06/2026). The plaintiff was permitted to exercise rights under a January 2025 agreement to slaughter and remove approximately 1,200 rubber trees from the defendant's property (valued at Rs. 30 lakhs) until January 30, 2029, while the defendant's ownership remains intact pending trial. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case with documentary evidence and bank transfers, determining that denying interim relief would cause irreparable injury given the time-bound nature of the contractual period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Feb-2026
Call on
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
09-Feb-2026
Call on
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
24-Jan-2026
For hearing on IA
Munsiff-Magistrate
-
17-Jan-2026
Order
-
17-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 11/2026
SUMMARY The Court of the Munsiff-Magistrate, Pattambi allowed the plaintiff's interim injunction petition (IA 02/2026) and dismissed the defendant's counter-petition (IA 06/2026). The plaintiff was permitted to exercise rights under a January 2025 agreement to slaughter and remove approximately 1,200 rubber trees from the defendant's property (valued at Rs. 30 lakhs) until January 30, 2029, while the defendant's ownership remains intact pending trial. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case with documentary evidence and bank transfers, determining that denying interim relief would cause irreparable injury given the time-bound nature of the contractual period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts