rafeek vs Azees.k Advocate - RAJESH V — 11/2026
Case under Civil Procedure Code, 1908 Section Order 7 Rule1. Status: Stayed. Call on. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLPK160000142026
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
10/2026
Filing Date
15-01-2026
Registration No
11/2026
Registration Date
16-01-2026
Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court, Pattambi
Judge
1-Munsiff-Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
rafeek
Adv. ABIDA P
Respondent(s)
Azees.k Advocate - RAJESH V
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Munsiff-Magistrate
Stayed. Call on
Stayed. Call on
Produce stay order
Call with IA
Call with IA
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Stayed. Call on | |
| 09-03-2026 | Stayed. Call on | |
| 02-03-2026 | Produce stay order | |
| 26-02-2026 | Call with IA | |
| 23-02-2026 | Call with IA |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY The Court of the Munsiff-Magistrate, Pattambi allowed the plaintiff's interim injunction petition (IA 02/2026) and dismissed the defendant's counter-petition (IA 06/2026). The plaintiff was permitted to exercise rights under a January 2025 agreement to slaughter and remove approximately 1,200 rubber trees from the defendant's property (valued at Rs. 30 lakhs) until January 30, 2029, while the defendant's ownership remains intact pending trial. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case with documentary evidence and bank transfers, determining that denying interim relief would cause irreparable injury given the time-bound nature of the contractual period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Order
SUMMARY The Court of the Munsiff-Magistrate, Pattambi allowed the plaintiff's interim injunction petition (IA 02/2026) and dismissed the defendant's counter-petition (IA 06/2026). The plaintiff was permitted to exercise rights under a January 2025 agreement to slaughter and remove approximately 1,200 rubber trees from the defendant's property (valued at Rs. 30 lakhs) until January 30, 2029, while the defendant's ownership remains intact pending trial. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case with documentary evidence and bank transfers, determining that denying interim relief would cause irreparable injury given the time-bound nature of the contractual period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts