BNS Gramin Nidhi Limited (Rep.By Executive Director, Suresh Babu.M) vs Prabeesh. K.V — 485/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Section 26. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLPK130007382025

Filing Number

720/2025

Filing Date

07-Oct-2025

Registration No

485/2025

Registration Date

08-Oct-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Ottappalam

Judge

1-Munsiff

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED WITH COST

Last updated 30-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Section 26

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BNS Gramin Nidhi Limited (Rep.By Executive Director, Suresh Babu.M)

    Adv. RAJAN V

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prabeesh. K.V

  2. 2.Sindhu. A

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    The Munsiff of Ottapalam decreed the suit in favor of BNS Gramin Nidhi Limited against the defendants, who had defaulted on a ₹25,000 loan sanctioned on 02.10.2024. The court ordered the defendants to pay ₹34,362 plus interest at 12% per annum from suit date to decree date and 6% thereafter, along with court costs, based on the uncontested loan agreement and promissory note evidence presented ex parte. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Munsiff

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    Munsiff

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    Munsiff

  7. 08-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 07-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 485/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Munsiff of Ottapalam decreed the suit in favor of BNS Gramin Nidhi Limited against the defendants, who had defaulted on a ₹25,000 loan sanctioned on 02.10.2024. The court ordered the defendants to pay ₹34,362 plus interest at 12% per annum from suit date to decree date and 6% thereafter, along with court costs, based on the uncontested loan agreement and promissory note evidence presented ex parte. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case